Tom Landry Stadium Petition

silverbear

Semi-Official Loose Cannon
Messages
24,195
Reaction score
25
SupermanXx;1690064 said:
it's not gonna happen. give it up. gosh...

How 'bout you just take your advice and...

Never mind, I don't wanna get an infraction...

It's beyond pathetic that you'd try to discourage a Cowboys fan from doing something so right, whether or not it ever has a chance of happening... for sure, it won't happen if nobody TRIES...

Guys like you annoy me more than the biggest troll I've ever met... instead of p*ssin' on the parade, you OUGHT to be going over and signing the petition...

That is, if you're REALLY a Cowboys fan... one of the absolute minimum requirements of being a Cowboys fan, I think, is to revere the memory of Tom Landry... Cajun is to be commended for what he's trying to do, even if it ultimately proves to be a quixotic effort...
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,574
Reaction score
27,856
silverbear;1690068 said:
How 'bout you just take your advice and...

Never mind, I don't wanna get an infraction...

It's beyond pathetic that you'd try to discourage a Cowboys fan from doing something so right, whether or not it ever has a chance of happening... for sure, it won't happen if nobody TRIES...

Guys like you annoy me more than the biggest troll I've ever met... instead of p*ssin' on the parade, you OUGHT to be going over and signing the petition...

That is, if you're REALLY a Cowboys fan... one of the absolute minimum requirements of being a Cowboys fan, I think, is to revere the memory of Tom Landry... Cajun is to be commended for what he's trying to do, even if it ultimately proves to be a quixotic effort...

If you want to waste your time go right ahead. Personally, i prefer to set attainable goals while you like to waste your time and get annoyed at people whn they point it out to you.

i say make it Tom Landry Field because regardless of how 'right' it would be no sane person is going to turn down $1 billion in naming rights.
 

dogunwo

Franchise Tagged
Messages
10,320
Reaction score
5,700
FuzzyLumpkins;1690075 said:
If you want to waste your time go right ahead. Personally, i prefer to set attainable goals while you like to waste your time and get annoyed at people whn they point it out to you.

i say make it Tom Landry Field because regardless of how 'right' it would be no sane person is going to turn down $1 billion in naming rights.
$1 billion? Is that hyperbolic? If not, where are you getting numbers like that?
 

Tusan_Homichi

Heisenberg
Messages
11,059
Reaction score
3,485
dogunwo;1690077 said:
$1 billion? Is that hyperbolic? If not, where are you getting numbers like that?

It'll be in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Even if it's not $1 billion, I don't think that'd be too far off for this stadium. It's going to be the crown jewel stadium in this country and most likely the world. Plus, if I'm not mistaken, I believe Arlington is getting a piece of the naming pie. There is no way the naming rights won't be sold.

It's a nice thought, but there is just no way it's going to happen.

Edit: Found it. Arlington will receive 5% of the naming rights up to $500,000 a year.

http://www.bonham.com/NewsDetails.aspx?NID=60
 

Tusan_Homichi

Heisenberg
Messages
11,059
Reaction score
3,485
Deal branding Dallas Cowboys' new venue would be a record setter, insiders say

Monday, April 02, 2007

Dave Moore - Dallas Business Journal

Speculation is that Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones is seeking a record-setting amount -- as much as $1 billion -- for naming rights to the new Cowboys stadium in Arlington.

The ambition to seek an all-time-high naming-rights deal falls in line with Jerry Jones' drive to build the most expensive NFL stadium in league history. The new stadium, to be completed in Arlington in 2009, is expected to cost about $1 billion.

And, some insiders say, Jones is gunning for a billion-dollar naming deal. That would more than double the two highest naming rights deals: the $400 million, 20-year Citibank N.A. deal for Citi Field, the New York stadium that would replace 43-year-old Shea Stadium, home to Major League Baseball's New York Mets; and the $400 million, Barklays plc deal for the Barclays Center, the Brooklyn home of the NBA's New Jersey Nets. Neither facility has been built yet.

The cash involved in the potential Cowboys naming rights deal effectively limits the pool of U.S. companies that could qualify to make the payments over a long period of time.

Frank Jones, a Houston attorney who helped Jerry Jones (no relation) lay the groundwork for building a new Cowboys stadium, said he doesn't think $1 billion for stadium naming rights is out of the question.

"If you look at the Dallas Cowboys and you look at that brand, it's probably the third most recognized in the world of sports," said Jones, who worked with the Jerry Jones family at Winstead Sechrest & Minick PC for three years. The lawyer now works at Greenberg Traurig LLP.

Jones said only the New York Yankees and the Manchester United soccer club are more internationally known than the Dallas Cowboys -- and that that notoriety makes the naming rights extremely valuable.

Frank Jones said he thinks Jerry Jones will stick with a local company in making a naming rights deal, mainly because a local company would see more benefit.

The attorney said he thinks Exxon Mobil Corp. is one of the likeliest candidates for buying the naming rights. "I can't think of anything more powerful than Exxon and that (Cowboys) star," Frank Jones said.

Gantt Walton, a spokesman for Irving-based Exxon Mobil, declined to comment on whether the firm is negotiating to buy the Cowboys stadium naming rights.

Frank Jones said the $1 billion figure is feasible, especially in light of the $310 million, 31-year deal that Reliant Stadium in Houston fetched for the NFL expansion team the Texas Titans.

He added, however, that Jerry Jones will be careful in protecting the Cowboys name from the tarnish of an Enron Field debacle -- that whatever company he partners with, it will be the right choice.

Enron Field in Houston later lost its name when the energy-trading company it was named for skidded into scandal; the naming rights then were passed on to Minute Maid, the Coca-Cola subsidiary.

However, observers say, don't expect Jerry Jones to compromise the Cowboys' brand name by pairing the stadium with a financially shaky company.

On March 19, the Texas Rangers announced it reacquired the name of its stadium after Ameriquest -- actually, its parent company, subprime lender Orange, Calif.-based ACC Capital Holdings -- agreed to give up the rights.

Fourteen months earlier, Ameriquest had declined the Rangers' offer to reclaim the name. That was before the firm was forced to make across-the-board cuts to trim expenses. Defaults on loans have jumped as customers have had trouble making their payments.

Two months before the Rangers' March 19 announcement, Ameriquest became more interested in the team's offer to reclaim the stadium's name, freeing the company from the balance of its 30-year, $75 million contract with the Rangers. The stadium now is known as the Rangers Ballpark in Arlington. The old name was Ameriquest Field in Arlington.

Terms of the agreement between Ameriquest and the Rangers were unavailable.

Meantime, some scoff at the idea of $1 billion for naming rights. Among them is University of Oregon Professor Dennis Howard.

Howard, who teaches at the Lundquist College of Business at the university, said the naming-rights craze has played itself out, mostly because so many facilities have sold their naming rights, it has created too much media "clutter."

So far, nine companies have failed to honor their stadium naming rights agreements out of financial concerns, said Howard, who teaches at the college's Warsaw Sports Marketing Center.

He said in order to reach $1 billion, the Cowboys will have to allow the naming-rights buyer incredible access to NFL fans and multiple opportunities to pair themselves with Cowboys players. Even then, he questions whether the opportunities would translate into $1 billion.

He said few publicly traded companies could justify the naming-rights purchase to stockholders.

Regardless of all the speculation, the Cowboys probably won't say who's buying the naming rights until about 2008, a year before the stadium opens, Frank Jones said.

Currently, mum's the word out of Cowboys headquarters at Valley Ranch. "Right now we're assembling a list of potential partners and we're not discussing it ... with the media," said Cowboys spokesman Brett Daniels.
 

BigDFan5

Cowboys Make me Drink
Messages
15,109
Reaction score
546
As said earlier, it is a nice thought but our contract with Arlington includes fee's from naming rights. Jerry couldnt change his mind even if he wanted to as he is contractualy bound to see the naming rights now.
 

Cajuncowboy

Preacher From The Black Lagoon
Messages
27,499
Reaction score
81
It is truly amazing. Either support the petition by signing it or shut up. No one asked for dissent in this thread. No one wants your negative input. Just shut up and go take some candy from a baby you big goofs.

It's funny, every time this is mentioned some one predictably posts the same article, saying the same things and they just don't get the while purpose of the thing. Amazing how some people are so dense.

Sign it or don't. It's up to you, but shut up already for crying out loud.

And oh yea, thanks to the nearly 900 of you have already signed the petition despite being ridiculed by the thought *****.
 

Mavs Man

All outta bubble gum
Messages
4,672
Reaction score
0
I'd sign it, but I think I already did the last time this was posted.
 

Dallas

Old bulletproof tiger
Messages
11,515
Reaction score
3
I swear. You folks take things so personally on here sometimes. This is an internet forum. Anyone can post what they feel. Don't go gang tackling someone just because they happen not to agree w/ what you are trying to do. Also - do not deny them the right to post how they feel about it.

That is what this entire place is about. So what they don't want to sign that petition. It means absolutely nothing to you. But you take it so personally.

Then the attacks come. I have to say that is worse than folks disagreeing w/ signing that petition.

Name calling and personal attacks are rediculous. Some of you are long time posters to our site doing this. It's sad. Real sad.

Maybe you shuold not post this kind of content if you can't take what others might feel about it. Not everyone is all Tom Landry. Some people realize that this is still a business at the end of the day. Sad? Yep - you bet it is. But it is REALITY.

Learn 2 deal better w/ a little negative spek sometime. Not asking much.
 

Cajuncowboy

Preacher From The Black Lagoon
Messages
27,499
Reaction score
81
Dallas;1690677 said:
I swear. You folks take things so personally on here sometimes. This is an internet forum. Anyone can post what they feel. Don't go gang tackling someone just because they happen not to agree w/ what you are trying to do. Also - do not deny them the right to post how they feel about it.

That is what this entire place is about. So what they don't want to sign that petition. It means absolutely nothing to you. But you take it so personally.

Then the attacks come. I have to say that is worse than folks disagreeing w/ signing that petition.

Name calling and personal attacks are rediculous. Some of you are long time posters to our site doing this. It's sad. Real sad.

Maybe you shuold not post this kind of content if you can't take what others might feel about it. Not everyone is all Tom Landry. Some people realize that this is still a business at the end of the day. Sad? Yep - you bet it is. But it is REALITY.

Learn 2 deal better w/ a little negative spek sometime. Not asking much.

Oh give me a break!
Sometimes some folks should shut up. Especially when they have nothing whatsoever to do with what is going on. There is no reason to act like an arse over this and they should respect someones right to do it if they want.

Telling someone to "Give it up" is absurd.
 

SupermanXx

Benched
Messages
4,009
Reaction score
0
Cajuncowboy;1690700 said:
Oh give me a break!
Sometimes some folks should shut up. Especially when they have nothing whatsoever to do with what is going on. There is no reason to act like an arse over this and they should respect someones right to do it if they want.

Telling someone to "Give it up" is absurd.

Give it up
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
37,688
Reaction score
18,038
eduncan22;1690150 said:
You never saw Landry coach.


Sorry for ya...

I saw Landry. EXciting coach. Innovative in his time.
Loved them Super Bowl wins during his tenure.

Then I saw hime through the 80s.
What a sad decline for the team.

That was then. And this is now.
They already have a statue for him. And a street name, I think. And there is this hat company that might have a "Landry" in its stock. Though only Blue Brothers reincarnations would wear that '50s topper.

Now let's get on with the future with new teams/players, coaches, fans.
The naming rights will make jerra richer. Nothing wrong with that in a capitalistic system. So don't hold that against him.

And in a few years there won't be many fans at the new stadium under the age of 35 who will remember landry.

I will, but time moves on.

(And let me say this: I admire the Landry admirers. It's a good cause and i wish you luck. But money always trumps nostalgia for decades past.)

Hey, hurry up Monday!!!
 
Top