Tony Romo: Gambling has made the NFL "less pure."

Mark

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,645
Reaction score
3,238
yes, because money was never a factor in the NFL before gambling.
Please explain?

Are you saying that the partnership of the NFL and gambling interests is relatively insignificant, or that it is indeed significant?
 

TequilaCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,418
Reaction score
7,545
But Tony, that would mean that even the officials would have to be in on it and act like they are just incompetent fools.....and the NFL office would turn a blind eye... and......, you know, i think he has a point. :eek: not pure at all, more like a sewage water pure.
 

Mark

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,645
Reaction score
3,238
Didn't take long for this to veer wildly off-topic, but I don't at all understand the vaguely misogynistic negative obsession with Taylor Swift. So, she's on TV for a total of about thirty seconds during a three-hour game? (Jack Nicholson & Spike Lee used to get about ten seconds at Lakers games, and nobody complained.) Big deal...who cares? Time to bring out the Barbie doll and have her victims point to what part she is hurting.
 

bigE79

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,830
Reaction score
8,394

KingCorcoran

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,076
Reaction score
1,678
Please explain?

Are you saying that the partnership of the NFL and gambling interests is relatively insignificant, or that it is indeed significant?
“Gambling interest” in deference to NFL football have existed for over 100 years, without any input from the League. Better to be directly involved than to find your league adversely affected by gambling interests in which you have no involvement.
 
Top