I want you to point out right now what "troll like stuff" I say about Romo?
All I have done here was point out FACTS.. 8 years of FACTS. That's all I do here. 8 years of not getting the job done. Is this "troll like stuff"? I really want you to point out. On the other hand, the stuff you say can be labeled as "troll like". The amount of excuses you make for Romo is "troll like". If Romo, by some God given miracle, wins a Super Bowl - I will shut up. Until then, I have the right to point out facts about Romo.
If you don't think what you say about Romo is troll-like, that's you're prerogative.
To me, you are the very definition of it. Always taking small samples and projecting it all around and always holding him..almost solely...accountable for team results.
Then hinting that Kyle freaking Orton is a better player...or that RG3 in year 1 form dwarfs Tony.
It's lunacy.
I get mad at myself sometime for even dignifying your rubbish with a reply.
That's why I asked if you wanted to mutually ignore each other.
It might be better for both of us.
I'm not kidding here...sometimes I think you have some sort of mental handicap. If that were the case, I could understand it more.
I mean, that Washington game two years ago (I notice the more recent one doesn't count with you) saw Dallas with a team that could not run at all, could not block at all, could not defend the run at all, and at the end of the game was missing its three top WRs (no Dez, Miles, or Harris) to go with no run game. Yes, a beat up Romo did screw up...but good luck on at least that final drive finding anyone that was driving it for the win with 4th stringers and no run game.