casmith07;3541164 said:Just like the Bears knew what they were doing with Colombo?
Stick to radio.
dbair1967;3541520 said:I'd sign him after the season to try him out maybe, but I wouldnt waste a spot this yr on him.
dcfanatic;3541533 said:This guy thinks the Bears and Colts are the same in evaluating talent.
Wow. Way to impress us.
Stick to being uninformed.
CCBoy;3541580 said:Way to find a way to insult based on misapplied logics...as very few left tackles make a real go there their first year. If they were great judges of talent, then that would be the FIRST conclusion involving his being taken onto their team to START, and a draftee that year to boot.
MIKE TEST, Testing....Testing....Testing.
Now there were plans by Indianapolis to start him at another offensive line position. Meaning that they still regarded him strongly, but he was injured and they needed more of a healthy alternative. He wouldn't replace Free to begin with, in any consideration for Dallas.
But don't even get high collar yourself. None of your 'facts' have been proven out. Indianapolis explained their reasons as I stated. :suxskins:
dcfanatic;3541603 said:You are not making any sense.
He played well when they first drafted him.
Now he's hurt and wasn't even playing Tackle any longer.
So like I said the Colts don't see much value in him anymore. I trust them. If it was the Raiders then maybe I don't. But since they put up 12 wins every year and play in the AFC Champ game more often than not I trust them.
As for insulting him. 'Stick to radio'. He gets what he gives. If he takes a shot then I take a shot. Same **** different day.
dcfanatic;3541533 said:This guy thinks the Bears and Colts are the same in evaluating talent.
Wow. Way to impress us.
Stick to being uninformed.
CCBoy;3541608 said:First, by substituting your own mental pauses in reasoning doesn't change the facts. They did NOT state he had NO value, they needed a healthy lineman. And stated it as such.
You are saying he had no value, and thus another poster was wrong in responding directly to yourself. You are wrong twice now on BOTH accounts.
UnoDallas;3541610 said:puttin words in his mouth - he never said that
http://i125.***BLOCKED***/albums/p50/stuntastic121/radiohead.jpg
dcfanatic;3541637 said:Yeah, that's what he said.
He compared the Bears making a mistake in letting Colombo leave to the Colts letting Ugoh leave. As if one organization hasn't proven they know a whole lot better than the other one..
dcfanatic;3541637 said:Yeah, that's what he said.
He compared the Bears making a mistake in letting Colombo leave to the Colts letting Ugoh leave. As if one organization hasn't proven they know a whole lot better than the other one.
Once again. We know where this is going. Another ****ing groupie is on the scene.
dcfanatic;3541626 said:So he has value to the Colts and that's why they cut him?
I am going back to earth. Peace.
Picksix;3541504 said:Having lived in Chicago and Indy for the majority of my life, there's no comparison between how Indy and Chicago run their organization. Polian is right a lot more than he is wrong, and the McCaskeys are pretty much clueless.
Stick to protecting our country.
casmith07;3541816 said:Touché