darthseinfeld
Groupthink Guru
- Messages
- 33,869
- Reaction score
- 38,476
I know this gets talked about ad nauseum, but I just want to see the what percentage of Cowboys fans actually want to trade him
I hope you are talking about 2026 coz there isn't a QB in this draft worth losing him.......imoI would only consider trading Micah if it meant we were using the picks to move up and draft a QB
I'm not worried about a decline, I'm concerned about him going on cruise control after the big pay day.Don't need to re-sign him. Can franchise him 2x I believe. Not as cap friendly but you aren't locked in if he has a decline, plus you can still trade him
5th year option + 1 tagDon't need to re-sign him. Can franchise him 2x I believe. Not as cap friendly but you aren't locked in if he has a decline, plus you can still trade him
I will give CeeDee his props, though. He got paid and is out there busting him hump. I highly doubt we will see the same from Micah.Quit trying.
I would revise that question. I don't think anyone in their right mind would want to trade him.I know this gets talked about ad nauseum, but I just want to see the what percentage of Cowboys fans actually want to trade him
IS NOT!This poll is irrelevant.
You guys grossly overstate how much of a toll signing Parson would have on the rosterI would revise that question. I don't think anyone in their right mind would want to trade him.
The question really is, can the Cowboys afford to keep him?
Yes, but at a very dangerous price. It would take the complete loss of any measurable depth on the team. Any injury to a starter would have a devastating effect. That is not a sound strategy going into a season.
I don't think the Cowboys can afford to keep him at his perceived market value.
I also thought the Cowboys should have only signed Parsons and Lamb before the season started because they represent the future more than Dak.