Troy Davis And Lawrence Brewer, A Tale Of Two Executions

TwoCentPlain

Numbnuts
Messages
15,283
Reaction score
11,162
ninja;4130406 said:
Did the guy who supposedly killed the cop ever take a lie detector test?

CowboyMcCoy;4130407 said:
Do you believe in those?

Yeah, I believe in lie detector tests. They work. I took one for a job interview back in the mid '80s. I passed.:)

If I were accused of a crime and innocent, the first thing I would do is volunteer for a lie detector test. If he didn't volunteer to take one or refused a request for one, then he is most likely guilty.
 

Manwiththeplan

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,300
Reaction score
7,800
ninja;4131030 said:
Yeah, I believe in lie detector tests. They work. I took one for a job interview back in the mid '80s. I passed.:)

If I were accused of a crime and innocent, the first thing I would do is volunteer for a lie detector test. If he didn't volunteer to take one or refused a request for one, then he is most likely guilty.

they refused his request, to take one.
 

DIAF

DivaLover159
Messages
4,798
Reaction score
897
ninja;4131030 said:
Yeah, I believe in lie detector tests. They work. I took one for a job interview back in the mid '80s. I passed.:)

If I were accused of a crime and innocent, the first thing I would do is volunteer for a lie detector test. If he didn't volunteer to take one or refused a request for one, then he is most likely guilty.

Polygraphs are notoriously inaccurate and easy to beat.
 

LeonDixson

Illegitimi non carborundum
Messages
12,299
Reaction score
6,808
CowboyMcCoy;4130384 said:
I don't expect you'll even get what I'm saying. I was talking about his stay and the fact it didn't last long. Keep up, Zrin. Keep up!
According to the news this was either the second or third time that his execution was delayed. I would imagine the court just finally said, "we've heard it all before and there's no reason to delay any longer.
 

CowboyMcCoy

Business is a Boomin
Messages
12,749
Reaction score
235
ninja;4131030 said:
Yeah, I believe in lie detector tests. They work. I took one for a job interview back in the mid '80s. I passed.:)

If I were accused of a crime and innocent, the first thing I would do is volunteer for a lie detector test. If he didn't volunteer to take one or refused a request for one, then he is most likely guilty.

Oh, I just learned that science has proven them wrong. Even the CIA and FBI know this. In any case, clenching your sphincter is the way to pass it because it does detect some physiological signs. I've never taken one, but I read a story about a government spy who did just that.
 

golfergirl

New Member
Messages
63
Reaction score
2
ninja;4131030 said:
Yeah, I believe in lie detector tests. They work. I took one for a job interview back in the mid '80s. I passed.:)

If I were accused of a crime and innocent, the first thing I would do is volunteer for a lie detector test. If he didn't volunteer to take one or refused a request for one, then he is most likely guilty.


Lie detector tests are as reliable as a 1-900 psychic. And also the reason they are easily dismissed in court. There are web sites and thousands of ways to falsify them.

I have passed them before for fun with flying colors and I was lying out the wazoo. Like anyone would believe I was the one who shot JFK. I also confessed to being the one that drove Hoffa to the river and dumped his body. Hell, I wasn't even born until 1976 so how does that work, since they were in 63 and 75 respectively.:laugh2:
 

TwoCentPlain

Numbnuts
Messages
15,283
Reaction score
11,162
golfergirl;4132147 said:
Lie detector tests are as reliable as a 1-900 psychic. And also the reason they are easily dismissed in court. There are web sites and thousands of ways to falsify them.

I have passed them before for fun with flying colors and I was lying out the wazoo. Like anyone would believe I was the one who shot JFK. I also confessed to being the one that drove Hoffa to the river and dumped his body. Hell, I wasn't even born until 1976 so how does that work, since they were in 63 and 75 respectively.:laugh2:

Who was giving the lie detector tests you faked your way through? The test is only as good as the person giving it. I highly doubt you lied about killing JFK to a NSA, CIA, or FBI lie detector test.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,194
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
ninja;4132159 said:
Who was giving the lie detector tests you faked your way through? The test is only as good as the person giving it. I highly doubt you lied about killing JFK to a NSA, CIA, or FBI lie detector test.

It's a fact that if you know what you're doing you can beat a polygraph test. Besides, polygraphs are not scientifically sound either. Someone just being extremely nervous about taking the test can fail while being fully truthful.

Now, placing a magnet opposite of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, can make lying more difficult. ;)
 

CowboyMcCoy

Business is a Boomin
Messages
12,749
Reaction score
235
Sam I Am;4132191 said:
It's a fact that if you know what you're doing you can beat a polygraph test. Besides, polygraphs are not scientifically sound either. Someone just being extremely nervous about taking the test can fail while being fully truthful.

Now, placing a magnet opposite of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, can make lying more difficult. ;)

Tom *****: People lie. They lie all the time. It's just a fact. There are countless situations where lying can give us an advantage in life. Sometimes, we lie just to spare a person's feelings. But just as lying can give us an advantage, it's in the interest of certain authorities and associates to detect our lies. Lie detector tests have been a part of law enforcement investigations for several decades. This, despite the fact that those tests have never been allowed as evidence in a trial. With the march of technology, that could change.

Now, several companies and agencies are experimenting with MRI technology that creates the brain scans they use to spot brain injuries and to study the workings of the brain. Some experts believe that by mapping the brain's activity, you can tell when a person is lying. This assertion is controversial to say the least. But if it's true, imagine the possible effect on our world, if you really could tell, beyond a reasonable doubt, that someone is lying. Would we use this as evidence in a trial? If you suspect an employee of theft or aiding a competitor, would you hook her up to the machine? If you're fiance says he really loves you, would it give you some reassurance if he would be willing to say it under a brain scan?


http://www.kpbs.org/news/2008/jun/03/using-an-mri-to-detect-lies/
 

golfergirl

New Member
Messages
63
Reaction score
2
ninja;4132159 said:
Who was giving the lie detector tests you faked your way through? The test is only as good as the person giving it. I highly doubt you lied about killing JFK to a NSA, CIA, or FBI lie detector test.

Naw, no big fuzz; just an ex who was a cop and I stopped by to have lunch with him, and we goofed off a bit, pretty cool actually.
 

TwoCentPlain

Numbnuts
Messages
15,283
Reaction score
11,162
golfergirl;4132871 said:
Naw, no big fuzz; just an ex who was a cop and I stopped by to have lunch with him, and we goofed off a bit, pretty cool actually.

I kind of thought so. Very, very, very few can beat a top notch NSA polygraph.
 
Top