blueblood70
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 43,419
- Reaction score
- 29,299
Doesn’t matter what number he wears....defenders and fans alike will only see a blur as he burns the field up
Doesn’t matter what number he wears....defenders and fans alike will only see a blur as he burns the field up
You're right.
They should have retired Jaylon Smith's number.
Joke, yes he chose 9 but after that thread from Dorsett have to weigh in on my virtual disgust of the team not retiring 9..
smh i liked #2 on Turpin, not sure why he changed
Updates: Turpin’s New Number; P-Squad Additions (dallascowboys.com)
On a serious note, I was always a huge Romo fan but I swear he has far more fans now than when he actually played. Kinda weird if you ask me
i prefaced my thread first word of first line with JOKE so the reaction is invalid.Can't retire all the numbers, especially without a championship. In fact, the only non-SB winning number I think they could maybe justify retiring is 82.
Joke, yes he chose 9 but after that thread from Dorsett have to weigh in on my virtual disgust of the team not retiring 9..
smh i liked #2 on Turpin, not sure why he changed
Updates: Turpin’s New Number; P-Squad Additions (dallascowboys.com)
Should be in ring of honorExactly. Romo was an outstanding QB, but 9 was never going to be retired.
Should be in ring of honor
Call me old fashioned but I still don’t like position players wearing single digits. Just looks dumb and amateur, like college. Worst rule change in a while imo. But I digress.
Should be in ring of honor
I totally agree!!!Call me old fashioned but I still don’t like position players wearing single digits. Just looks dumb and amateur, like college. Worst rule change in a while imo. But I digress.
I agree, NFL has turned into college football 2.0...Call me old fashioned but I still don’t like position players wearing single digits. Just looks dumb and amateur, like college. Worst rule change in a while imo. But I digress.