I can understand that to a degree. But, I have to blame the HC in that situation because I believe that is what the HC is responsible for. They are the ones that set up practice, discipline players, decide who starts and who sits, etc.
Secondly, I think Murray developed into a real talent. Getting the franchise's single season record for rushing. Beasley was a UDFA that I think is a valuable player, but when you don't have a deep threat and lousy QB's, he's just not going to be productive.
I think under Garrett we saw quality development of Murray, Dunbar, Dez, Williams (not great, but not bad), Beasley, Hanna (good blocking TE), Dwayne Harris, Tyron, Leary, Frederick, Martin, T. Crawford and Lee. And that doesn't include players that are young that look promising, but we don't know how they will turn out like Lawrence, B. Jones, Hitchens, Whitehead, etc.
When Wade was fired, this team was a mess on both sides of the ball. If Garrett were to be fired, I think this team is in FAR better shape than it was after Wade was fired.
To me, the problem isn't player development or talent (outside of backup QB). We have greater issues schematically where Garrett is too consumed with making things plain in order to have the 'next man up.' That works great at Alabama where Saban can have far superior talent due to recruiting budgets and location. In the NFL, it's a different story. Of course, schematically....Wade is one of the very best on defense...he is just terrible when it comes to developing talent. I'd rather take the former, but it still doesn't mean you're automatically building a successful organization.
YR