vta
The Proletariat
- Messages
- 8,753
- Reaction score
- 11
Yeagermeister;3412667 said:Ali would have used that aggression against him and let him wear himself out. He would have ropa-doped him.
We'll never know, unfortunately.
Yeagermeister;3412667 said:Ali would have used that aggression against him and let him wear himself out. He would have ropa-doped him.
vta;3412666 said:Foreman certainly was not Mike Tyson. He was big and strong, but..., well you can look at both in some footage and there's a wide chasm between Foreman and Tyson.
Doomsday101;3412673 said:Yes I can where Foreman maintained blance and he hit much harder than Tyson. Mike was a lunger leaving his feet. Ali would have killed him just as Douglas did as he side step the wild punches of Tyson and then clocked him and then moved. If someone is dumb enough to stand toe to toe with Tyson they would lose those who beat Tyson did not just stand in front of him they stuck and moved
vta;3412680 said:Those who beat Tyson did so after he was already scrambled and out of his element, due to the **** storm of nonsense being heaped on him by leeches.
Tyson was taught very sound principles of boxing in his early years and was much more than just a lunger. Whatever he became after Cus died and the foolishness took over was not Tyson at his best.
Doesn't matter really, I'm not going to agree.
Yeagermeister;3412722 said:Yes we will never know but Ali was WAY more skilled as a boxer than Tyson ever was. We will have to agree to disagree.
HoleInTheRoof;3412728 said:Put Tyson against Ali in the ring now. Tyson would destroy him.
Yeagermeister;3412722 said:Yes we will never know but Ali was WAY more skilled as a boxer than Tyson ever was. We will have to agree to disagree.
vta;3412734 said:NO! You must see it my way! I'll twist your arm!
vta;3412680 said:Those who beat Tyson did so after he was already scrambled and out of his element, due to the **** storm of nonsense being heaped on him by leeches.
Tyson was taught very sound principles of boxing in his early years and was much more than just a lunger. Whatever he became after Cus died and the foolishness took over was not Tyson at his best.
Doesn't matter really, I'm not going to agree.
Maikeru-sama;3412766 said:Here is a good Wiki article on boxing styles:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boxing_styles_and_technique
I agree with the article, I think Mike Tyson was an 'in fighter'. Mike Tyson's style was to use the 'peek-a-Boo' technique to get 'inside' of his opponents and use very powerful uppercuts to defeat an opponent.
Also, I am not saying a Mike Tyson in his prime couldn't defeat an Ali in his prime. What I take issue with is someone claiming that Mike Tyson would 'destroy' Muhammad Ali, who was arguably the greatest boxer of all time.
The main problem Mike Tyson would give Mohammad Ali is Tyson's quickness and at times, it is hard for taller fighters (Ali was 6-3 and Tyson was 5-11) to deal with much smaller opponents.
Also, for those don't think Ali could get into Tyson's head, go look up the "Right Hand Lead" technique that Ali used to drive Foreman absolutely crazy.
I remember watching George Formean on 'The Best Damn Sports Show Period' and he said during the fight, Ali would constantly say, "C'mon George, is that all you got" and Foreman said he kept thinking too himself, "Yep, that's pretty much it" .
Foreman's punching power was legendary. When he would hit punching bags during training, it would leave huge dents and would often have to be replaced after the training session.
I don't see Muhammad Ali being destroyed by any fighter that's ever lived. Beaten? Yes, but not destroyed.
Yeagermeister;3412749 said:Not when I have this
http://img.***BLOCKED***/albums/v316/Yeagermeister/ban-button.gif
CATCH17;3412291 said:Lesnar vs Shane Carwin will be electric.