Kaiser
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 16,628
- Reaction score
- 28,430
You might want to rewatch that play. Wentz was blitzed and the pocket started to collapse. He stepped up, then ran to his right while watching the field the whole time. He saw Sproles break upfield and laid a perfect pass in to him while on the move. Damn good play, not as simple dump off. Also, Skip doesn't mention that Wentz's receivers probably lead the league in dropped passes. His stats would look better if even half of those balls were caught.
There is no reason to denigrate Wentz to make Dak look better. Both show great promise. We don't know who will be better. I do know that we got the better bargain, but if Wentz is the real deal, then the Eagle's paying price was not too high.
I saw the entire play at least three times. He escaped pressure and threw to the checkdown option. Am I denigrating Wentz to say the play is average? Do I have to demand his face be carved into Mount Rushmore because he made a play every starting QB in the league makes several times a game?
I can show you a hundred plays from Romo or Rodgers or Luck that are amazing throws, brilliant reads, etc. Do you really think that play from Wentz belongs in the same company as plays like that?
I never said Dak was better than Wentz and I agree we won't know which one is better for years. But we know what each team paid for each QB and for the price of FOUR early picks, Wentz needs to be great in order to justify the cost the Eagles paid. I don't see anything in that plays that screams "Great". And if Wentz is good rather than great, the Eagles lost that trade.