using von Miller in the Anti-trust suit

[blindzebra]

Only proves that the union's main goal is to protect the elite players.

If their stance is actually wanting the best for past, present and future players a player that will more depict the usual NFL player is better.

They should have used two incoming players:

One that is slotted as a 2nd-4th round pick, that plays a position that historically has a chance at a long career but one that has shown more life changing long term health problems from joint, back and neurological issues...say a guard.

Two a late round, bottom of the roster, ST player that has a very short career.

Using a player that in all likelihood will be financially set for life the minute he signs his first contract is dumb. Actually using any player that plays a highly valued position only shows their real agenda.

 

[LatinMind]

Only proves that the union's main goal is to protect the elite players.

If their stance is actually wanting the best for past, present and future players a player that will more depict the usual NFL player is better.

They should have used two incoming players:

One that is slotted as a 2nd-4th round pick, that plays a position that historically has a chance at a long career but one that has shown more life changing long term health problems from joint, back and neurological issues...say a guard.

Two a late round, bottom of the roster, ST player that has a very short career.

Using a player that in all likelihood will be financially set for life the minute he signs his first contract is dumb. Actually using any player that plays a highly valued position only shows their real agenda.

its always been about the upper 5% of the union.

 

[speedkilz88]

I don't think they should be using a non union member at all.

 

[unionjack8]

i hope von miller rots in the cfl in winnipeg or saskatoon and NEVER gets a shot in the nfl.

 

[CCBoy]

And next year, another group of players can choose to challenge limitations upon negotiation rights for drafted players, and use new collegiate players in the lawsuite. Thus expanding upon make-believe right of entry into control of proceeds off the top, while NOT sharing cost of industry expenses as well.

At these levels of non-responsibilites for demanding rewards, I just have no sympathy. Neat parlor tricks that the average 'joe' has to provide the payment for.

When courts support such disjointed application in the real function of a business, where high levels of lifestyle and health issues are ALL provided without ANY individual requirement for searching for, acquiring, and negotiations for which. Justice is just NOT being served, as it abuses the inherent requirement for both accountability for success as well as privacy in it's rewards. Intervention on base of deprivations is just not an issue at that point.

Political intervention into protections of individual solvency and and privacy are being aborted in dysfunction. Again NOT reflective of righting a base level requirement for that intervention and redirection of true and base level rights in the work arena.

Contract enforcement can not then be applied in the name for justice, as justice is no longer at cruxt of attention. But a political convenience has replaced practicality of real justice considerations.

 

[urface59]

And next year, another group of players can choose to challenge limitations upon negotiation rights for drafted players, and use new collegiate players in the lawsuite. Thus expanding upon make-believe right of entry into control of proceeds off the top, while NOT sharing cost of industry expenses as well.

At these levels of non-responsibilites for demanding rewards, I just have no sympathy. Neat parlor tricks that the average 'joe' has to provide the payment for.

When courts support such disjointed application in the real function of a business, where high levels of lifestyle and health issues are ALL provided without ANY individual requirement for searching for, acquiring, and negotiations for which. Justice is just NOT being served, as it abuses the inherent requirement for both accountability for success as well as privacy in it's rewards. Intervention on base of deprivations is just not an issue at that point.

Political intervention into protections of individual solvency and and privacy are being aborted in dysfunction. Again NOT reflective of righting a base level requirement for that intervention and redirection of true and base level rights in the work arena.

Contract enforcement can not then be applied in the name for justice, as justice is no longer at cruxt of attention. But a political convenience has replaced practicality of real justice considerations.

I used to fancy myslef as atleast a semi smart person... but after reading this carefully 3 times and still not understanding a single damn thing you just said I'm starting to form a lower opinion of my intellect.

 

[SDogo]

And next year, another group of players can choose to challenge limitations upon negotiation rights for drafted players, and use new collegiate players in the lawsuite. Thus expanding upon make-believe right of entry into control of proceeds off the top, while NOT sharing cost of industry expenses as well.

At these levels of non-responsibilites for demanding rewards, I just have no sympathy. Neat parlor tricks that the average 'joe' has to provide the payment for.

When courts support such disjointed application in the real function of a business, where high levels of lifestyle and health issues are ALL provided without ANY individual requirement for searching for, acquiring, and negotiations for which. Justice is just NOT being served, as it abuses the inherent requirement for both accountability for success as well as privacy in it's rewards. Intervention on base of deprivations is just not an issue at that point.

Political intervention into protections of individual solvency and and privacy are being aborted in dysfunction. Again NOT reflective of righting a base level requirement for that intervention and redirection of true and base level rights in the work arena.

Contract enforcement can not then be applied in the name for justice, as justice is no longer at cruxt of attention. But a political convenience has replaced practicality of real justice considerations.

wow, I have no idea what you said but I'm sure it was good

 

[DallasEast]

i hope von miller rots in the cfl in winnipeg or saskatoon and NEVER gets a shot in the nfl.

Whoa! Is this post about the decertification, the lockout or just about the player?

 

[YosemiteSam]

I hope the teams red flags Miller and nobody drafts him in the top 10.

 

[SDogo]

I hope the teams red flags Miller and nobody drafts him in the top 10.

I hope he drops to 40! That will teach him!:

 

[YosemiteSam]

Whoa! Is this post about the decertification, the lockout or just about the player?

It's about both. Miller is taking part in the antitrust. The players were basically offered $5B and they didn't except that. May they all burn in hell. Including Miller.

 

[YosemiteSam]

I hope he drops to 40! That will teach him!:

I'm 100% with you on that.

 

[TwoCentPlain]

And next year, another group of players can choose to challenge limitations ...

I got that far understanding what you wrote. After that, nothing

 

[DallasEast]

It's about both. Miller is taking part in the antitrust. The players were basically offered $5B and they didn't except that. May they all burn in hell. Including Miller.

Both = Two

1) Decertification
2) Lockout
3) Von Miller

 

[YosemiteSam]

Both = Two

1) Decertification
2) Lockout
3) Von Miller

"All" whatever. It's all one deal if you ask me.

NFL Lockout->Decertification->Von Miller Sues. It's all the same subject.

 

[SDogo]

Both = Two

so we can assume if both = 2 then both of the both would = 4 or both squared.

 

[YosemiteSam]

so we can assume if both = 2 then both of the both would = 4 or both squared.

Excellent!

 

[DallasEast]

"All" whatever.

Right.

so we can assume if both = 2 then both of the both would = 4 or both squared.

[edit] Even after all 'this'. I'm still kinda curious what ukinto8 thinks. :laugh1:

 

[SDogo]

Right.

Trust me, my math is horrible so I would be impressed that I came up with that.

 

[ThreeandOut]

I hope he drops to 40! That will teach him!:

Yeah, if I were Von Miller, I don't think I would be attending the draft, assuming he's invited. You don't want to be that guy that ESPN puts the camera on after every pick is made and asks when you are going to be picked. He could be in for a very long night.