using von Miller in the Anti-trust suit

[JD_KaPow]

I don't think they should be using a non union member at all.

They have to. Only a player eligible for the draft would have standing to bring the lawsuit (if I understand all this correctly).

 

[67CowboysFan]

Trust me, my math is horrible so I would be impressed that I came up with that.

Did your wife figure that out for you? Tell the truth.

 

[5Stars]

I used to fancy myslef as atleast a semi smart person... but after reading this carefully 3 times and still not understanding a single damn thing you just said I'm starting to form a lower opinion of my intellect.

:laugh2: :laugh2: :laugh2: :laugh2: :laugh2:

Smoke a doobee, read it again, drink a shot of Tequila, read it again, you might get some sense out of it!

Me, I can totally understand what he's saying...in other words, if you cannot dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bull****...!

That's my man, CCBoy...it takes awhile to get used to it.

 

[AbeBeta]

Only proves that the union's main goal is to protect the elite players.

If their stance is actually wanting the best for past, present and future players a player that will more depict the usual NFL player is better.

They should have used two incoming players:

One that is slotted as a 2nd-4th round pick, that plays a position that historically has a chance at a long career but one that has shown more life changing long term health problems from joint, back and neurological issues...say a guard.

Two a late round, bottom of the roster, ST player that has a very short career.

Using a player that in all likelihood will be financially set for life the minute he signs his first contract is dumb. Actually using any player that plays a highly valued position only shows their real agenda.

Let's see. The primary financial issue with an antitrust exemption is that it ends up putting limits on the earning power of the top players. Seems logical to pick a guy who stood to be in that group.

Or one could take your approach and make an argument that was less relevant to the antitrust exemption.

 

[DeaconBlues]

And next year, another group of players can choose to challenge limitations upon negotiation rights for drafted players, and use new collegiate players in the lawsuite. Thus expanding upon make-believe right of entry into control of proceeds off the top, while NOT sharing cost of industry expenses as well.

At these levels of non-responsibilites for demanding rewards, I just have no sympathy. Neat parlor tricks that the average 'joe' has to provide the payment for.

When courts support such disjointed application in the real function of a business, where high levels of lifestyle and health issues are ALL provided without ANY individual requirement for searching for, acquiring, and negotiations for which. Justice is just NOT being served, as it abuses the inherent requirement for both accountability for success as well as privacy in it's rewards. Intervention on base of deprivations is just not an issue at that point.

Political intervention into protections of individual solvency and and privacy are being aborted in dysfunction. Again NOT reflective of righting a base level requirement for that intervention and redirection of true and base level rights in the work arena.

Contract enforcement can not then be applied in the name for justice, as justice is no longer at cruxt of attention. But a political convenience has replaced practicality of real justice considerations.

Wrong. Once the players and owners come to an agreement, incoming college players are bound to that agreement. Suits challenging the NFL draft during an existing agreement have repeatedly failed in court.

 

[DeaconBlues]

I used to fancy myslef as atleast a semi smart person... but after reading this carefully 3 times and still not understanding a single damn thing you just said I'm starting to form a lower opinion of my intellect.

I stopped after the first paragraph. That I understood.

 

[Beast_from_East]

i hope von miller rots in the cfl in winnipeg or saskatoon and NEVER gets a shot in the nfl.

Dude, Von Miller is a top 10 beast.


I dont care how many lawsuits he files, he is a freaking stud on the field. Anybody that would not want him on their team either doesnt understand the game or likes losing.

 

[CanuckCowboysFan]

i hope von miller rots in the cfl in winnipeg or saskatoon and NEVER gets a shot in the nfl.

whereabouts in Toronto are you from?

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

When courts support such disjointed application in the real function of a business, where high levels of lifestyle and health issues are ALL provided without ANY individual requirement for searching for, acquiring, and negotiations for which. Justice is just NOT being served, as it abuses the inherent requirement for both accountability for success as well as privacy in it's rewards. Intervention on base of deprivations is just not an issue at that point.

Its called freedom.

You are justifying authoritarianism and your 'high levels' are nothing more than an opinion. Instead of coating it with crap you can call it what it is. A contract negotiated between consenting adults.

The only coercion that ever goes on in this scenario is a limitation on what will be paid.

I personally believe that a man deserves to be paid what he is worth. Worth is determined by the market and not by your opinion.