Vegas bouncer who was shot sues Pacman

Big Dakota;1537757 said:
So do you suppose this guy will have about a dozen witnesses in his civil suit? They have already said they have 7 employees that witnessed the events. Heck, Goldman had NONE and still nailed OJ. I only hope Tommy Urbanski sues him for millions, and he WILL get it.
I seriously hope this guy loses a big lawsuit to Urbanski. I don't think he'll change until it really starts affecting his wallet.
 
AtlCB;1537949 said:
I seriously hope this guy loses a big lawsuit to Urbanski. I don't think he'll change until it really starts affecting his wallet.


I am sure he will.

Sympathetic father. Paralyzed. Has Kids.

Question is, how many zeroes after the "1" will be involved.
 
carphalen5150;1537956 said:
I would hope he gets more than that.

You think?

From Pac-Man?

I don't know how much proof is necessary for a payout in a civil trial, but weren't they unable to tie Pac-Man's saliva to the bite on this guy's leg through DNA testing? If the bouncer claims PacMan did that, when he didn't, I guess suddenly the rest of his claims become suspect?
 
superpunk;1537962 said:
You think?

From Pac-Man?

I don't know how much proof is necessary for a payout in a civil trial, but weren't they unable to tie Pac-Man's saliva to the bite on this guy's leg through DNA testing? If the bouncer claims PacMan did that, when he didn't, I guess suddenly the rest of his claims become suspect?
A civil trial is all about liability. He has to prove that PacMan is liable for his damages.

And it isn't all or nothing, you can be 54 percent liable, 60 percent, etc.

All in all, he has probably got an excellent case.
 
superpunk;1537962 said:
You think?

From Pac-Man?

I don't know how much proof is necessary for a payout in a civil trial, but weren't they unable to tie Pac-Man's saliva to the bite on this guy's leg through DNA testing? If the bouncer claims PacMan did that, when he didn't, I guess suddenly the rest of his claims become suspect?
I think the guy actually has a good civil case regardless of the DNA. He can't sue directly for the shooting, as no shooter has been charged. But for all the other stuff which led up to the shooter, I think he has a pretty good chance at getting pizzaid...

And if the lawyer knows what he's doing, more than likely he'll get some upfront cash and a percentage of any additional contractual money Pac might make in the NFL.
 
WoodysGirl;1537966 said:
I think the guy actually has a good civil case regardless of the DNA. He can't sue directly for the shooting, as no shooter has been charged. But for all the other stuff which led up to the shooter, I think he has a pretty good chance at getting pizzaid...


Really? Pizzaid? Is that what we say?
 
superpunk;1537962 said:
You think?

From Pac-Man?

I don't know how much proof is necessary for a payout in a civil trial, but weren't they unable to tie Pac-Man's saliva to the bite on this guy's leg through DNA testing? If the bouncer claims PacMan did that, when he didn't, I guess suddenly the rest of his claims become suspect?


For a civil all you have to do, is get the Judge to believe that you sustain suffer able damages from the defendant. If he has enough people to stand and say "I saw" the judge will rule in favor of the plantiff.
 
superpunk;1537962 said:
You think?

From Pac-Man?

I don't know how much proof is necessary for a payout in a civil trial, but weren't they unable to tie Pac-Man's saliva to the bite on this guy's leg through DNA testing? If the bouncer claims PacMan did that, when he didn't, I guess suddenly the rest of his claims become suspect?

The biting is peanuts compared to the shooting. If the bouncer's lawyer can show that Pacman's actions lead to the shooting, Pacman will have to pay up.
 
dargonking999;1537970 said:
For a civil all you have to do, is get the Judge to believe that you sustain suffer able damages from the defendant. If he has enough people to stand and say "I saw" the judge will rule in favor of the plantiff.

Well, you really have to get around 15 people to think that.
 
Crown Royal;1537972 said:
Well, you really have to get around 15 people to think that.

I think 15 people will magically appear for testimony ;). What happened in Vegas, didn't say in Vegas that night :D
 
dargonking999;1537974 said:
I think 15 people will magically appear for testimony ;). What happened in Vegas, didn't say in Vegas that night :D

I meant the jury.
 
Thanks for the 18 different answers.

I trust Crown Royal's, though. Something about his diabeetus just screams "Love me."
 
superpunk;1537981 said:
Thanks for the 18 different answers.

I trust Crown Royal's, though. Something about his diabeetus just screams "Love me."
So you didn't like my pizzaid comment? I'm hurt.
 
WoodysGirl;1537983 said:
So you didn't like my pizzaid comment? I'm hurt.

Better luck next time. If you could incorporate more ebonics, I would appreciate it. ;)
 
superpunk;1537981 said:
Thanks for the 18 different answers.

I trust Crown Royal's, though. Something about his diabeetus just screams "Love me."
http://img523.*************/img523/2008/diabeetusyp1.jpg
 
WoodysGirl;1537983 said:
So you didn't like my pizzaid comment? I'm hurt.


I laughed.


But I have a feeling many people here don't understand it.
 
Crown Royal;1537988 said:
diabeetus_3.jpg
[


You got served....sucka.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,121
Messages
13,789,935
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top