Vela: We Need a Deep Threat

Teague31

Defender of the Star
Messages
18,221
Reaction score
22,842
The Buffalo Bills of the early ’90s offer a case study in the value of a deep threat.

In 1990 their K-gun, three wide receiver no-huddle offense ran roughshod over the NFL. Only a determined ball control New York Giants attack and a missed Scott Norwood field goal kept this unit, which pasted Oakland with 51 points in the AFC title game, from winning the Super Bowl.

That team scored over 28 points a game. Its receiver trio divided up the field. Andre Reed was the all purpose threat, a complete player who could beat you on the flanks and in the middle. Don Beebe was a speed threat from the slot. Thurman Thomas was a running and receiving threat from the backfield.

They got their room to operate because James Lofton kept opposing safeties honest. He averaged almost 19 yards per catch, so defenses could not load up the short zones trying to stop Thomas and Reed.

In ‘92 Lofton began to age. By ‘93 Lofton was gone and while the Bills made their final two Super Bowl runs their points per game dropped to 24 and then 21 points per game though Beebe, Reed, Thomas and Jim Kelly were still going strong.

The ‘07 Cowboys may not seem like the proper parallel with those old Bills. After all, their points per game rose from over 26 to over 28 points from ‘06 to ‘07. And this came with Terry Glenn playing in the first season and not playing in the latter.

I would argue that the Cowboys’ improvement came from a better passing scheme, that better utilized Terrell Owens and some maturity from Tony Romo.

Let’s look at the Cowboys’ December. They scored 28 points against a Detroit team hell bent on stopping Owens, but had to go the long way to do so. Jason Witten caught 16 passes in that game and Dallas lost its big play capability.

Against the Eagles, Owens was again doubled, though Romo’s scattershot play affected the team more than anything.

Against Carolina, Dallas ran off two scoring drives in the first half, but scored only six points after Owens left with a bum ankle. The Cowboys would score only four field goals in the six quarters after he left.

In the playoff game, Dallas showed great skill at converting third down passes, but had no deep threat. New York doubled the game Owens and while he and Jason Witten got their yards, the plays that linger are Patrick Crayton’s drop and stutter step in the final seconds.

Dallas needs a deep threat. It had a very good one in Terry Glenn but lost him to a knee injury, one that will likely end his career. What’s more, it needs one that is good out of the box. Rookie receivers are notoriously slow to develop; a Randy Moss is a rare bird.

For a blueprint, they can look to New England. The Patriots’ ‘06 ended in Indy, when their defense collapsed in the second half. The most obvious shortcoming seemed to be the aging linebacking corps, that could not cover Colts’ tight ends and receivers.

Instead, the New England brain trust looked at its receiving corps, which dropped several key passes in that loss, and blew it up. For a modest price, the Pats got a wealth of veteran production. They:

traded a 4th round pick to Oakland for Randy Moss;
traded a 2nd and a 7th round pick to Miami for Wes Welker, whom they signed to a long term deal;
signed free agent Donte Stallworth to a one year $3.6 M deal with an option.
The Patriots gave Tom Brady dependable targets and watched their points per game explode from 24 a game last season to almost 37 this year. Teams could double Moss, but risked having Stallworth or Welker destroy them.

Dallas learned this the hard way. They kept Moss in check for much of the game but had no answer for Welker and watched Stallworth burn them for a 60 yard bomb in the 4th once the defense dialed up harder blitzes to get Brady.

Bloggers talk about chasing Moss, who will be a free agent, but he’ll be a top dollar signing. Dallas already has the all purpose threat in Owens and a steady, over the middle slot man in Crayton, who signed an extension this year.

Getting the deep man is key, and guys like this don’t cost an arm and a leg. Look at Stallworth’s contract. That’s in line with what Crayton will be making. It’s the mid priced deal that can be so valuable if the other pieces are in place.

That’s why I look at Chicago’s Bernard Berrian and to Stallworth himself as top targets for Dallas in free agency. Berrian has a reputation as being one dimensional but its the dimension Dallas lacks. He averaged 15.5 yards per reception in the Bears’ ‘06 Super Bowl drive and had a higher average until teams realized he was the lone legitimate weapon in Chicago’s passing arsenal.

He’s durable and should not cost a fortune.

Also look for Stallworth, who is due a $6 million roster bonus by February 25th. With Moss and Asante Samuel also facing free agency, there’s not much chance the Pats pick this up. He might be a good signing for a team at something approaching his ‘07 money.

With Jason Garrett staying the passing system will remain intact. Adding the deep speed should make Owens and Witten that much better, not to mention the running game.
 

windward

NFL Historian
Messages
18,689
Reaction score
4,542
I personally prefer Berrian over Stallworth. Stallworth seems to get too dinged up over the course of a season
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,336
Reaction score
64,039
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Great article, but my question is this. Can Stallworth be as productive in our offense as he has in the Patriots?

I don't have his numbers, just my personal observations/opinions of him. Before this year, I don't remember him as being as dependable catching the ball. He's made some clutch catches for New England that he seemed to always drop at his other stops. He still makes me feel uneasy.

Berrian makes me feel even more uneasy. Sure, Grossman isn't the best of quarterbacks, but I've seen him drop Rex's bad AND good passes at crucial times the last two seasons.

I don't know. I would rather hang my hat on the chance of landing Larry Fitzgerald or Roy Williams than go for either of these guys. Are the possibilities of Fitzgerald and Williams being available this offseason open or close?
 

windward

NFL Historian
Messages
18,689
Reaction score
4,542
DallasEast;1915096 said:
Great article, but my question is this. Can Stallworth be as productive in our offense as he has in the Patriots?

I don't have his numbers, just my personal observations/opinions of him. Before this year, I don't remember him as being as dependable catching the ball. He's made some clutch catches for New England that he seemed to always drop at his other stops. He still makes me feel uneasy.

Berrian makes me feel even more uneasy. Sure, Grossman isn't the best of quarterbacks, but I've seen him drop Rex's bad AND good passes at crucial times the last two seasons.

I don't know. I would rather hang my hat on the chance of landing Larry Fitzgerald or Roy Williams than go for either of these guys. Are the possibilities of Fitzgerald and Williams being available this offseason open or close?
Agreed. If the rumors are true that he can be had for a second rounder, then we should be all over that.
 

MichaelWinicki

"You want some?"
Staff member
Messages
47,997
Reaction score
27,917
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Great article by Vela.

Glenn is finished.

I'd take Stallworth or Berrian.
 

sago1

Active Member
Messages
7,791
Reaction score
0
Totally agree with your analysis. It was obvious later in the 2nd half of the season that teams were trying to take TO out of the game which left us with Witten, a great TE, but lacks speed. Neither Crayton nor Hurd have speed while Austin does but he's not a dependable WR. Adding a speedy WR should be our first acquisition, hopefully in FA where he could step in immediately. That's why the question of whether to re-sign Adams or not is so vital. If Adams is re-signed, it really limits our options in FA to either grab a good fast WR or a good CB. In any case I also think we need draft a good young WR who will need time to develop and can eventually replace TO. Same goes for drafting a CB cause doubt we got the cap space to sign one of the top 3 FAs.

On this is moot if the coaching staff, particularly Houck, doesn't believe Free can step into the LT spot immediately and protect Romo's backside.
 

windward

NFL Historian
Messages
18,689
Reaction score
4,542
smarta5150;1915105 said:
Mario Manningham, move along.
You want him in the first? Or do you think we can trade up to get him in the second.
 

windward

NFL Historian
Messages
18,689
Reaction score
4,542
sago1;1915110 said:
Totally agree with your analysis. It was obvious later in the 2nd half of the season that teams were trying to take TO out of the game which left us with Witten, a great TE, but lacks speed. Neither Crayton nor Hurd have speed while Austin does but he's not a dependable WR. Adding a speedy WR should be our first acquisition, hopefully in FA where he could step in immediately. That's why the question of whether to re-sign Adams or not is so vital. If Adams is re-signed, it really limits our options in FA to either grab a good fast WR or a good CB. In any case I also think we need draft a good young WR who will need time to develop and can eventually replace TO. Same goes for drafting a CB cause doubt we got the cap space to sign one of the top 3 FAs.

On this is moot if the coaching staff, particularly Houck, doesn't believe Free can step into the LT spot immediately and protect Romo's backside.
I'm not so sure it's about lack of speed rather than the inability of Crayton and Hurd to get consistent ly open. Maybe a guy like Roy Williams could (not really a speed demon) adequately fill that role.
 

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
windward;1915111 said:
You want him in the first? Or do you think we can trade up to get him in the second.

Hopefully a 2nd but with a good workout he might be a 1st rounder, if thats the case than i wouldn't mind using our 1st and Cleveland's on a corner.
 

windward

NFL Historian
Messages
18,689
Reaction score
4,542
smarta5150;1915115 said:
Hopefully a 2nd but with a good workout he might be a 1st rounder, if thats the case than i wouldn't mind using our 1st and Cleveland's on a corner.
what about rb?
 

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
windward;1915123 said:
what about rb?

I wanna keep Jones........................ ;)

CB with our 1st pick then Manningham/RB with our next 2.

If we have to trade up in the 2nd to do it then I say do it.
 

Natedawg44

Active Member
Messages
2,598
Reaction score
0
What kind of wheels does Bryant Johnson have?
Andre Davis or Drew Carter could help for much cheaper.
 

slick325

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,517
Reaction score
9,346
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
windward;1915113 said:
I'm not so sure it's about lack of speed rather than the inability of Crayton and Hurd to get consistent ly open. Maybe a guy like Roy Williams could (not really a speed demon) adequately fill that role.

I'm with you on this one. It's not about a lack of speed at the other WR spot.

I would love to have Roy Williams because he would beat one on one coverage more times than not. If T.O. gets doubled, the WR opposite needs to be able to get open and make a play after the catch. That is exactly what Roy Williams and Fitzgerald would be able to do. Plus, either one can step into the lead WR or #1 WR role easily once T.O. starts to fade. Berrian and Stalworth cannot.

With an extra 1st round pick I hope Jerry explores the possiblities of trading for either of those WR's.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,336
Reaction score
64,039
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
slick325;1915145 said:
I'm with you on this one. It's not about a lack of speed at the other WR spot.

I would love to have Roy Williams because he would beat one on one coverage more times than not. If T.O. gets doubled, the WR opposite needs to be able to get open and make a play after the catch. That is exactly what Roy Williams and Fitzgerald would be able to do. Plus, either one can step into the lead WR or #1 WR role easily once T.O. starts to fade. Berrian and Stalworth cannot.

With an extra 1st round pick I hope Jerry explores the possiblities of trading for either of those WR's.
:hammer: Keep your eyes focused on the future.
 

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
We got TO and Austin for deep threats but I'm more concerned about establishing short routes..
 

SuspectCorner

Still waiting...
Messages
10,242
Reaction score
2,861
ELDudearino;1915219 said:
We got TO and Austin for deep threats but I'm more concerned about establishing short routes..

Sure Austin is fast - but what if we actually need to... (gulp)... throw to him? Other than straightline speed - I haven't seen anything from the guy.
 

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
outthedoorbill;1915227 said:
Sure Austin is fast - but what if we actually need to... (gulp)... throw to him?

Hopefully it won't be raining:D
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
outthedoorbill;1915227 said:
Sure Austin is fast - but what if we actually need to... (gulp)... throw to him? Other than straightline speed - I haven't seen anything from the guy.

he's still learning, but he is entering the crucial 3rd year for WRs, so '08 is the year to see whether he has something, or not

edit: reading about what the Bills were doing w/ Thurman Thomas in the passing game, has me yearning for Chris Johnson even more
 

ctrous25

Stay Classy Philly/Minny
Messages
1,438
Reaction score
648
My ? is this....Would Jerry give that up? Maybe if other teams our also willing to trade a 2nd rounder we could also give them... a 1st round pick from '06 that Bill drafted I like the player but he wont be in impact player for us we also have Burnett as a quality backup.. Lions and Cards could use a quality player like Carpenter
 
Top