ABQCOWBOY;5051943 said:I'd be happy with 23 and 52.
jterrell;5051781 said:Vikes make a much more intriguing trade partner for me than ATL.
Pick 23 or 25 and a late 3rd or early 4th and a late 7th would add depth to our draft haul without moving down past that mid 20's range where there are some guys I like expected to fall. If we get the 3rd rounder we might need to swap picks in round 4 with them giving us their lowest selection for a move down of about 6 spots for us.
My mock in the round 4 scenario would be something like:
23J Fluker OT
47:Kawann Short DT
80J Swearinger S
102:Ryan Swope WR
114:Oday Aboushi OG
151:Nick Casa TE
185:Zac Stacy RB
229:Jeff Tuel QB
FWIW I did this exercise but still prefer Richardson, Warmack or Cooper at 18 to this by a long shot.
ABQCOWBOY;5051935 said:Jennings, IMO, is not that deep threat WR that he used to be or that the Vikings desperately need. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that Jennings is nobody. I'm saying that they have nobody who can stretch the field and make them honor the deep threat. Nobody that will make anybody move a Safety out of the box like Harvin could.
Perhaps I stated that poorly.
TheSport78;5051835 said:I love this.
I honestly wouldn't be surprised if we traded down to MIN's 23rd pick, acquire an extra 3rd rounder, and selected Sylvester Williams in the 1st round.
Questfor6;5051860 said:I'd tell them you give me 23 & 25 for 18 and we've got a deal. I know they wouldn't take the deal but I'd at least try.
tm1119;5051975 said:25 and 52 for 18 and 80 makes a lot of sense to me. There's a ton of value in the 2nd round and I'm not crazy about anybody at 18 besides Cooper, Warmack, and Richardson.
Dallas still gets the slightly better deal in that trade he described.PJTHEDOORS;5052402 said:Why would the Cowboys also give their 3rd rnd pick? Makes no sense.