theogt;2460507 said:
You're going out on a bit of limb here.
Typically, you get a TRO put in place when the lawsuit is filed in order to prevent the irreparable harm the lawsuit is aimed at. I'm not sure why you'd think a lawsuit hasn't been filed.
I said that it didn't "appear" that one had been filed. If they have actually filed a lawsuit then the judge is acting correctly but that information was not included in the story, so it didn't appear that one had been filed.
And actually, if there are some sort of legal rights violated, or potentially violated, they're doing exactly their job. They have the authority. The "circumventing the due process" line is just nonsensical. The court system is "due process."
Actually, no they are NOT doing their job. It is not a judge's job to enforce a person's legal rights, that's what law enforcement is for. Technically, it is the District Attorney's job to see that legal rights are not violated. His role is to determine if someone's rights have been violated and to prosecute the violators.
Unless a case is actually being presented before this judge then he is acting on his own initiative and outside the purview of his authority, at least as I understand it. The judicial system has been twisted over the years to a point where judges are handing down decisions, injunctions, and whatnot from the bench with no real authority to do so.
It's sometimes best, I find, not to use legal jargon unless I fully understand what it means.
I quite agree.