Vinatieri or Owens?

LittleBoyBlue · Mar 13, 2006

If you had to have just one(not both) who would you choose?

rojan · Mar 13, 2006

I love TO but we need a kicker so I will go with AV

Doomsday · Mar 13, 2006

Owens

theogt · Mar 13, 2006

TO of course. If the ball is in the end zone, there's no need to kick field goals.

fweegy · Mar 13, 2006

Adam, the kicker alone would give us at least 2 more wins

SA_CowboyFan · Mar 13, 2006

I guess TO. Logic says he puts up points in multiples of 6, while AV can only do 3 at a time.

Paniolo22 · Mar 13, 2006

AV without hesitation.

Muhast · Mar 13, 2006

T.O.. doesnt matter how good A.V is if we cant move the ball into field goal range

wager58 · Mar 13, 2006

3 points or 6 points hmmmmmmmm.

Hostile · Mar 13, 2006

Diahhrea or constipation?

hmm.

austintodallas · Mar 13, 2006

That's a tough one. I guess if you're forcing me to choose I'll go with Vinatieri.

Anguillidae · Mar 13, 2006

Vinatieri. (I don't want TO to mess up our team..)

JJB500 · Mar 13, 2006

I Say T.O.

Rogerthat12 · Mar 13, 2006

YoMick said:
If you had to have just one(not both) who would you choose?

Obviously Vin...but we can sign both

ravidubey · Mar 13, 2006

Owens. Peterson would be nearly as good as Viniateri. No one is as good as Owens.

STREAK84 · Mar 13, 2006

T.O. baby!!!

Rack · Mar 13, 2006

Vinatieri.

And all you people that picked Owens simply don't have a clue.

Big Country · Mar 13, 2006

BOTH!!!

And I think it very well could happen!!!

ddh33 · Mar 13, 2006

I want the guy that most affects the defense. That's TO. Whether you like him or not, he changes the game...

Of course, I wouldn't mind having both.

CactusCowboy · Mar 13, 2006

AV, screw T.O.