Voch: George Karlaftis film study

Zero, two who are considered 3rd round prospects.

That tells me they either don't expect one to be there at 24 or they like Williams at 56 more than the one or two that may fall ( like the kid from Prudue) Then again their thinking could be after the top 2-3 players ( edge rushers) you can put the next 5-10 in the same basket, depending on your flavor. Hell, they all have holes in their game. It's not we're talking Bosa or Chase Young here........
 
That tells me they either don't expect one to be there at 24 or they like Williams at 56 more than the one or two that may fall ( like the kid from Prudue) Then again their thinking could be after the top 2-3 players ( edge rushers) you can put the next 5-10 in the same basket, depending on your flavor. Hell, they all have holes in their game. It's not we're talking Bosa or Chase Young here........
Someone mentioned our 30 visit list might have Dallas day invites as well, there could be a few mystery candidates. Williams does appear to be their favorite
 
Someone mentioned our 30 visit list might have Dallas day invites as well, there could be a few mystery candidates. Williams does appear to be their favorite
I like the Williams kid but hes raw. He relies on his speed and bend. His technique is raw and needs work. I like him in rd 3. I think he can be a rotational specialist on 3rd down.He reminds me of Dante Fowler.
 
I also think TE is very likely in rd 4 or 5
I like the TE Woods. He's a playmaking TE much like Shannon Sharpe. He will need to learn how to block. He is a hybrid wr/TE..can move him all over and create mismatches. I might draft him in rd 3.
 
I hear we really like Trey McBride and Cade Otton. McBride is a pass catching TE..BUT Otton is a in line blocker with pass catching skills as well.
 
I like the Williams kid but hes raw. He relies on his speed and bend. His technique is raw and needs work. I like him in rd 3. I think he can be a rotational specialist on 3rd down.He reminds me of Dante Fowler.
I think you got in right. More of a developmental player with good physical tools to work with.
 
I like the TE Woods. He's a playmaking TE much like Shannon Sharpe. He will need to learn how to block. He is a hybrid wr/TE..can move him all over and create mismatches. I might draft him in rd 3.
They might have to take him higher, also like him. Otton, Rucker are the other ones who are good fits
 
Lets not forget we have McKeon . He showed flashes last year when he had chances. He and Schultz may have big years if Kellen can get them involved more. First and foremost we must figure out the oline and running game. If we do that, the TE's will be better.
 
I would luv to see us use a two TE system with a full back. Spread teams out and run the rock and stretch the field in the seam. San Fran did this with success.
 
EAEB8-BA3-B7-F5-43-E9-A83-C-02093-D3-F0-DB8.jpg
 
Daks window will be closed in 3 years. It wont matter how well we draft if we arent a more physical team in the trenches. We can draft all the sexy talent we want, but if we arent built from the inside out, its a waste. The winning teams are physical. We are finesse. Lastly, Kellen and Mm need 2 get on the same page and get the players the right play calls. Dak thrives and gets in rhythm when we establish a timing based short passing game. 2 step quick throws is where he is best. Gets him going. Thes slow developing passes get us in trouble.
 
His bend is one of his stronger traits.
Not sure about that. Bryan Broaddus said differently. I've watched tape and he looks like a guy that plays with power but lacks great technique and bend. I like him, just not early.But their will be a run on edge guys like always.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
465,932
Messages
13,905,882
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top