Wanna-Be Talent Evaluators

[BourbonBalz]

So despite the defense playing poorly, did he put the team on his shoulders and win it anyway (that's what I mean by that)?

Next.

He never got the chance. The defense gave up the winning points on the last play of the game. I should note the zebras ignored a blatant hold on the pass to the TE that lead to the winning FG.

 

[Pass2Run]

He never got the chance. The defense gave up the winning points on the last play of the game. I should note the zebras ignored a blatant hold on the pass to the TE that lead to the winning FG.

Did he do it against San Fran?

 

[CalPolyTechnique]

]

if there are only 3-4 of them, why not just send them a message. There are over 5k active zoners, why worry about 3-4 of them who have a different opinion?

 

[BourbonBalz]

Did he do it against San Fran?

No, but no one on the entire team played well, particularly the Oline.

 

[Pass2Run]

No, but no one on the entire team played well, particularly the Oline.

That's what I mean. He's not the type of QB to pull a rabbit out of his hat at the last moment, like a Favre, Elway, etc. Doesn't put the team on his shoulders despite a bad oline, bad defense, etcetera.

it's OK. A QB like him can win. He just needs to be in the right system.

 

[Blitzen]

There have been postings and comments from highly paid NFL personnel like former and current coaches, players, GMs, and scouts who've given Dak Prescott the respect he deserves. None of them said Dak is on Rodgers, Mahomes or Brady's level, but they've said Dak is a top 10 quarterback.

Dak's production according to NFL.COM's statistics/production has placed him in the top 10.

Im not going to point anybody out specifically, but they know who they are. Its a few here that have legit concerns about Dak moving forward with this team, then there's the handful of haters that downplay anything good Dak HAS done and place blame on Dak for things that isn't his fault.

There's this ONE question that I've noticed that never gets answered from the Dak haters and it actually makes them run, hide, and skip over the question. Here it is....

1. If the NFL professionals, from coaches to GMs, current and former players and scouts say that Dak is a very good quarterback and he's a top 10 quarterback and his PRODUCTION places him in the top 10.... and you (the hater) says Dak isn't good and he's top 10....

Are you (the hater) going on record to say that you know more about football and evaluating quarterback talent than ALL OF THOSE HIGHLY PAID NFL PERSONNEL that ive listed above that get paid millions to eat, sleep and breathe football for a living???

NO DAK HATER HAS EVER ANSWERED THIS QUESTION!!!!

But why not????

Just wait till he puts it all together and you can shove it all the hater fans faces-victory is near!!

 

[Aerolithe_Lion]

Not to derail your witch-hunt, but it is possible that the Dak haters agree with the talent evaluators and still have their crusade.

The idea isn’t that he doesn’t deserve top 10, it’s more that a bottom-of-the-top-10 QB isn’t quite enough to overcome the way the organization is currently being run.

Sometimes ‘Good Enough’ just isn’t good enough

 

[PAPPYDOG]

Agreed, it truly is sad.....

Not the case we just want him gone so we can maybe get a true Franchise QB and WIN WIN WIN WIN WIN when it counts......
You know against teams with a pulse.....
Winning is this so hard for the Dak Dolls to understand but I guess they have their garbage stats (Primarily from the NFC East) and they're happy.

 

[88sAndHeartbreak]

That's what I mean. He's not the type of QB to pull a rabbit out of his hat at the last moment, like a Favre, Elway, etc. Doesn't put the team on his shoulders despite a bad oline, bad defense, etcetera.

it's OK. A QB like him can win. He just needs to be in the right system.

Both teams in the SB last year were "bus driver" lead teams, especially the Rams. Brady and Rogers supreme talent has tricked people into thinking that having a top two qb is the only way... it's not.

Like the Rams, the front office has to stop sitting on their hands, and make serious moves if they want to make a serious playoff run in today's NFL. That's the reason why Rogers hasn't won in so long.

 

[jrumann59]

The QB play in the NFL is in the dark ages as it pertains to all around QB talent. QBs today are not as "smart" as they were an era ago. Back in the 90s there were a slew of excellent QBs, Aikman, Kelly, Marino, Young, Favre, Moon, Montana, Bledsoe, Elway. Then you had the likes of Everett, Cunningham, Kosar, DeBerg, Brunell, Hebert, Chandler, Neil O'Donnell. Saying a QB is top 10 after Brady, Mahomes, Rodgers really is not saying a lot, everyone from 4-32 are jockeying for position but really until one can show what they can do in the post season they will forever be on the outside looking in.

 

[88sAndHeartbreak]

Not the case we just want him gone so we can maybe get a true Franchise QB and WIN WIN WIN WIN WIN when it counts......
You know against teams with a pulse.....
Winning is this so hard for the Dak Dolls to understand but I guess they have their garbage stats (Primarily from the NFC East) and they're happy.

How did the defense, special teams, and coaching perform in those games? (Playing against +.500 teams)

 

[Section446]

Dak = AVERAGE

 

[jwooten15]

You’re making a dedicated call-out thread because you don’t like that 3-4 people, out of thousands on here, dare to disagree with you?

This is an opinion forum. And you have a problem with viewing others’ opinion? Kinda oxymoronic if you ask me.

 

[Section446]

This is an opinion forum. You’re making a dedicated call-out thread because you don’t like that 3-4 people, out of thousands on here, dare to disagree with you?

Damn you and your logical reply.

 

[88sAndHeartbreak]

The QB play in the NFL is in the dark ages as it pertains to all around QB talent. QBs today are not as "smart" as they were an era ago. Back in the 90s there were a slew of excellent QBs, Aikman, Kelly, Marino, Young, Favre, Moon, Montana, Bledsoe, Elway. Then you had the likes of Everett, Cunningham, Kosar, DeBerg, Brunell, Hebert, Chandler, Neil O'Donnell. Saying a QB is top 10 after Brady, Mahomes, Rodgers really is not saying a lot, everyone from 4-32 are jockeying for position but really until one can show what they can do in the post season they will forever be on the outside looking in.

It's becoming all about team building in today's NFL. That's why the Bills and Rams are so highly favored, they have great qb's AND great teams around them. Eventually the qb market will plateau because of it.

This is just where the NFL is trending, so of course I could be wrong and Brady 2.0 will blow everyone else out the water, and reset the market.

 

[jwooten15]

Not to derail your witch-hunt, but it is possible that the Dak haters agree with the talent evaluators and still have their crusade.

The idea isn’t that he doesn’t deserve top 10, it’s more that a bottom-of-the-top-10 QB isn’t quite enough to overcome the way the organization is currently being run.

Sometimes ‘Good Enough’ just isn’t good enough

Well said!

 

[PAPPYDOG]

How did the defense, special teams, and coaching perform in those games? (Playing against +.500 teams)

We deserve a better QB than Dak........ it's as simple as that!

 

[88sAndHeartbreak]

We deserve a better QB than Dak........ it's as simple as that!

You didnt answer the question.

We deserve a better front office. JJ has been in charge of the 28 year downfall... not Dak.

 

[plasticman]

I love Dak, he made the post-Romo transition almost painless. We never had to go through the nightmare of a Hennings/Hutchinson/Stoerner/Leaf/Carter/Wright debacle like the early 2000's.

There are many ways to justify his top ten ranking and the best way is won/loss or statistical evidence. Citing the quotes of NFL evaluators is probably not the best choice.

Sports show analysts are also entertainers, and their honest opinion is rarely voiced. Nobody within an NFL organization is going to critique an opponent quarterback publicly, that creates additional incentive on the part of NFL player when facing that particular team. They will always give you the superlatives, how good he is, how tough it will be to play against him.

 

[GINeric]

We deserve a better QB than Dak........ it's as simple as that!

Dak is a top 10 quarterback. Last I checked, the quarterbacks rated higher than him are all signed.

With that said, you never answered the question. You're the MAIN one I was talking about when running, deflecting, and hiding from ONE simple question....

Prove to the great people on this board that you are NOT one of these low IQ, weak *** Dak hatin cowards who can't explain their hate with actual proof to back up your argument.

Former and current players, coaches, GMs, and scouts said that Dak is a very good quarterback who's top 10 in this league..... Dak's PRODUCTION has literally placed him in the top 10 according to the official NFL standings. Here's one simple question....

Do you think you know more about football talent and quarterbacking at the highest levels THAN former and current players, coaches, GMs, and scouts that say the complete opposite of what you've been saying about Dak????