Verdict;5042635 said:Which of the top two guards is Warford more like?
RS12;5042665 said:Warford is RG only so it makes me wonder how interested they are.
newnationcb;5042675 said:IMO, he's just a slight notch below Warmack (the same type of inline blocker whose athleticism is effective in an extended phone booth) and would be considered no more than 10 spots lower if he were a BCS champion.
CopenhagenCowboy;5042735 said:This is part of Jerry's reasoning why he won't touch Warmack at 18.
Fredd;5042742 said:I think Warford int he 3rd would be great value, but I would assume and hope that we already have taken an offensive lineman by then...I would then assume that they don't take a 2nd OL that early (in the 3rd)...
but, who knows with our draft history (although it has gotten better after the 2009 debacle)
jnday;5042766 said:Warford would be a good pick in the second. He will never make it to the third.
Verdict;5042635 said:Which of the top two guards is Warford more like?
jnday;5042766 said:Warford would be a good pick in the second. He will never make it to the third.
newnationcb;5042675 said:I don't buy that at all. At the senior bowl practices and game he took several reps as a LG and performed very well.
IMO, he's just a slight notch below Warmack (the same type of inline blocker whose athleticism is effective in an extended phone booth) and would be considered no more than 10 spots lower if he were a BCS champion.
Bware_Dware;5042777 said:According to many "experts" do t be surprised if he is picked before 18.... Because guards are so highly coveted all of a sudden...
