Was Gallimore a healthy scratch?

Gonzomandela01

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,197
Reaction score
2,786
Just hear Big Mike saying it was a coache's decision between him and Tristen, wonder if he is playing that bad or they are trying to light a fire under his big bottom.
 
Just hear Big Mike saying it was a coache's decision between him and Tristen, wonder if he is playing that bad or they are trying to light a fire under his big bottom.
Not quite, seems like he had a small injury and didn’t get the work in practice staff wanted to see to feel like he was ready. So Hill got the nod.




Why did the numbers change as to where it would have to be one or the other though is my question.
 
Watkins done such a good job against run, forcing Gallimore out of a job. Most podcasts say it was a healthy scratch.
 
Not quite, seems like he had a small injury and didn’t get the work in practice staff wanted to see to feel like he was ready. So Hill got the nod.




Why did the numbers change as to where it would have to be one or the other though is my question.



I think watkins had been on the ps? Maybe thats over?
 
Yeah, the Cowboys claim his wrist injury kept him out, but Broaddus says that he's in their doghouse.
If that's true that's unfortunate. I think i only really remember him making like one play so far this season. I was hoping he would take the next step but apparently the step was in the wrong direction.
 
Just hear Big Mike saying it was a coache's decision between him and Tristen, wonder if he is playing that bad or they are trying to light a fire under his big bottom.
So we struggle to stop the run and our coach thinks playing Hill over Gallimore is a good idea? Im sticking with it was the wrist because Nothing else makes sense
 
Yeah, the Cowboys claim his wrist injury kept him out, but Broaddus says that he's in their doghouse.
If true, good for him, for all his training camp talk he showed very little so far, I had very high hopes for him to lock down 1T position.
 
So we struggle to stop the run and our coach thinks playing Hill over Gallimore is a good idea? Im sticking with it was the wrist because Nothing else makes sense

Neither Hill nor Gallimore are that great against the run. Bohanna and Watkins are the run stoppers. Gholston seems to have some ability in that area as well.
 
I thought Gallimore was going to be our Vita Vae this year. Not so much.
We need to be stronger up the middle to make a serious run. I’m for taking a chance on Suh!
 
Gallimore is starting to look like a bust. He’s battle some injuries and hasn’t done much.
 
..lol.. between Galli and Hill? C'mon guys Galli is clutch. Hill is still work in progress.
 
Not quite, seems like he had a small injury and didn’t get the work in practice staff wanted to see to feel like he was ready. So Hill got the nod.




Why did the numbers change as to where it would have to be one or the other though is my question.

They seem to be playing DT's fewer snaps than last year. Odighizuwa is below 60%, Gallimore below 40% and Hill below 30%.

Ive noticed packages with DE's inside on passing downs more than before. Im not sure how accurate that is because its just something I notice in broadcasts. But them using those packages more could he why they arent playing the DT's as much, and why it's a choice between Gallimore and Hill
 
Note to fans: Our DTs suck. It doesn't matter which are inactive.
Hill and Gallimore are jags on their best days, and Odighizuwa is probably an average starter at best. Odighizuwa is probably the only on that should on the field with any consistency
 
We gonna need em all against bears. Need fast lb too to stop qb runs.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
474,040
Messages
14,508,628
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top