Was Mike McCarthy holding Dak back to entertain his game plan?

Qcard

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,929
Reaction score
7,591
Does is seem like, post 49ers, they just threw away the original game plan and just let Dak play? Early on, it looks like the plan was to run, "dink and dunk," control the TOP and let Defense dictate the outcome. It just appears they seemed to unleash Dak and just said "to hell with it". Thoughts?
No....the Defense was a Historic Pace!!

Everything was weird.

Cowboys have settled to their norm..We are what we are after Thanksgiving Game
 

Cydios

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,270
Reaction score
6,552
We are playing bad teams. How can some folks not see this? When will Dak be “unleashed” on good teams in the playoffs?
Eagles? Granted a loss and not perfect at the end... he balled on them
 

charron

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,510
Reaction score
13,852
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Mike was holding the offense back. Not intentionally because he does believe in his own junk offense.
 

gtb1943

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,079
Reaction score
3,122
Correction: the Dallas Cowboys are 23-25 in games Dak has started against teams with winning records.

I mean if you are going to blame Dak for the losses, shouldn't the team that supposedly carries him to wins also be at fault for defeats?
and thus all wins are Dallas wins not Dak wins right?
 

cmoney23

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,676
Reaction score
2,137
Does is seem like, post 49ers, they just threw away the original game plan and just let Dak play? Early on, it looks like the plan was to run, "dink and dunk," control the TOP and let Defense dictate the outcome. It just appears they seemed to unleash Dak and just said "to hell with it". Thoughts?
Sure seems like it.
 

LovinItAll

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,658
Reaction score
1,762
Does is seem like, post 49ers, they just threw away the original game plan and just let Dak play? Early on, it looks like the plan was to run, "dink and dunk," control the TOP and let Defense dictate the outcome. It just appears they seemed to unleash Dak and just said "to hell with it". Thoughts?
They said they wanted all the ‘Dak is an int machine’ talk to stop, so it seems like it because that was the plan. Additionally, we could tell Dak didn’t have a complete handle on the new offense at first. He sure seems to have it now.
 

Clove

Shrinkage
Messages
64,667
Reaction score
27,233
In fairness to Dak, he's never been a big interception guy until last year. Those are just facts.
 

IceBowler

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,339
Reaction score
1,816
I think we are back to the Kellen Moore offense.

Last week, I saw the team fake a screen one way, then throw the screen back another way. That was a KM staple play.
Nope - not running 7 yard curls 3 yards short of the sticks. THAT's KM's offense ..
 

McMicah

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,038
Reaction score
2,311
I truly believe that if the FO doesn’t fire McCarthy to keep Quinn, they deserve to lose for years. Make Quinn the HC and bring in a Kellen-like OC
 

Brooksey

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,953
Reaction score
7,258
Does is seem like, post 49ers, they just threw away the original game plan and just let Dak play? Early on, it looks like the plan was to run, "dink and dunk," control the TOP and let Defense dictate the outcome. It just appears they seemed to unleash Dak and just said "to hell with it". Thoughts?
There are many things that happened since SF, yes we opened up the playbook some but it's not Garrett/Moore with long developing hooks, more posts and slants.
Brandin Cooks got involved, Cee-Dee has been next level, O-line has some continuity, Bland got us over Diggs.

Dak has been lights out.
 
Top