Washington is Prime Example of why you Don't Dump Dak

[MountaineerCowboy]

They don't remember what it was like between 2000 - 2005. Those were horrible years.

I don't know how to tell you this but when it comes to the QB position, we're still in those years.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

No team has won a SB without a top 3 defense, but a few have won with less than stellar QBs.

lol what?

 

[noshame]

Can't dump Dak we don't have the money.
so draft some competition for him. nobody can complain about having competition let the best man win
There were open receivers all over the field yesterday
Just not open enough for Dak. Most of them he flat out doesn't see.

SEE SCOUTING REPORT.

 

[Redsfan_83]

The elephant in the room is the GM as I said in my initial post.
Dak hasn’t been here for 27 years.

this is the now, not the last 27. They are paying Dak quite the load to play like this. I don't care about the fancy stats, although there is plenty of blame to go around how can anybody be confident in our QB, who has to be our team leader?

 

[kskboys]

Even with all his mistakes, our soft defense has me more worried than the guy who has our offense as one of the top in the league.

Did you sleep through the game yesterday?

 

[IrishAnto]

this is the now, not the last 27. They are paying Dak quite the load to play like this. I don't care about the fancy stats, although there is plenty of blame to go around how can anybody be confident in our QB, who has to be our team leader?

And the GM now is who?

 

[RustyBourneHorse]

I don't know how to tell you this but when it comes to the QB position, we're still in those years.

Not really. In comparison to where we were then, I do think that, between Romo and Dak, that we've had drastically better play since then. I do not think the failures in Romo's career were entirely on him either. I think, for example, Murray doesn't fumble and/or the call goes the other way in the Packers playoff game, then Romo would be viewers in a very different light. I say this because we had already destroyed the Seahawks earlier that season. Thus, assuming we beat Seattle like I think we would have, we would have played the Patriots. I still argue that we were a better team that year than the Patriots were. So, I think we would've won number 6 if not for that.

As for Dak, he's a solid QB in a different way. I do wish he'd cut down on the interceptions, but I like the fact that he's becoming a bit more of a gunslinger. I think one area that Dak, and Romo to an extent, have issues with that are out of their control is the frequent dropped passes by the WRs/TEs. I don't know if there's a team that has more drops than we do, and I saw several passes that should have been easy catches that were dropped. Some of the drops were on Dak, but I think a large portion were well thrown balls. I do think that drafting a QB, as I've said time and time again in this thread and another thread, would be good for getting some competition for Dak. I think the time has come for him to face competition with the knowledge that QB could take his spot in two seasons. That's where I think this should go. I think our D, other than CB and NT, is in a spot where it's in a very good position to succeed. I think the only real other area of concern is T and maybe WR (unless Hilton stays another season). So, if we're going to take a QB, especially in round 2, this is the year to do it.