superpunk
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 26,330
- Reaction score
- 75
It is a risky trade precisely because he has played in 133 straight games, because he's on the wrong side of 30, and because it was a trade for a player with a large salary, with all those attributes working against him, who decided that a dancing show was adequate preparation for the rigors of an NFL season.Naes;2283965 said:Freak injuries can happen to anyone at any time. The guy has played in 133 straight games and people think it was a risky trade. Pretty silly.
He'll be back and ready to go in a week or two.
There are any number of reasons why it was a stupid, risky trade based on the desperate reaction of a franchise that couldn't handle an injury to the magnificent Phillip Daniels. That's been borne out thus far.