Watching this Bears game makes me even more angry

iceberg;1312814 said:
oh yea, did wonders for us.


Actually if you would've watched the game you'd know that we would've won if not for other things.

Tune in next time.
 
otero1;1312834 said:
In other words.. watch the Bears game and shut up. :lmao:

Yes!! Because unlike us, the Bears are ATTACKING that weak secondary...
 
mansta54,im not talking about yall running timing routes in your offense,im saying romo was making huge plays with his feet or arm when you were rolling and that romo wasnt doing that when you were losing..romo made plays but not when you had to have them as much in your losing stretch..THATS MY POINT!!!
 
redskins1;1312840 said:
mansta54,im not talking about yall running timing routes in your offense,im saying romo was making huge plays with his feet or arm when you were rolling and that romo wasnt doing that when you were losing..romo made plays but not when you had to have them as much in your losing stretch..THATS MY POINT!!!

How bout yalls losing stretch!! 5-11 and DEAD LAST... Shouldn't you be concerned with that???
 
Sarge;1312827 said:
You can and SHOULD be pass happy when the opposing team has their entire starting secondary out.


If we had done that and lost, I guarantee there would have been 200 posts saying we abandoned the run too easily.
 
redskins1;1312840 said:
mansta54,im not talking about yall running timing routes in your offense,im saying romo was making huge plays with his feet or arm when you were rolling and that romo wasnt doing that when you were losing..romo made plays but not when you had to have them as much in your losing stretch..THATS MY POINT!!!

What point?? Sorry dude but I know you and know you well. When you've never played organized sports in your entire life and your team is in disaray at 5-11 and DEAD LAST, its impossible for me to take anything you say seriously or respect your point at all.... Its impossible!!!
 
CanadianCowboysFan;1312855 said:
If we had done that and lost, I guarantee there would have been 200 posts saying we abandoned the run too easily.

Aaah your figuring out the 2nd guessing of the Cowboy fan.

Its the biggest emberassment there is out there for me as a Cowboy fan.
 
Mansta54;1312848 said:
How bout yalls losing stretch!! 5-11 and DEAD LAST... Shouldn't you be concerned with that???

They're not concerned. Gibbs ran vanilla game plans all season so the rest of the league wouldn't know what they were going to do in 2007.
 
CanadianCowboysFan;1312855 said:
If we had done that and lost, I guarantee there would have been 200 posts saying we abandoned the run too easily.

If we'd done that - we'd probably be playing this weekend. The bottom line is (and this doesn't take but a 4th grader to comprehend)....you ATTACK and take advantage of the other team's weakness. Especially when you have their entire secondary out and you virtually have two (not one, but two) WR's with 1000 yards.

Why WOULDN'T you attack a depleted secondary?

God forbid you take advantage of another teams weakness.

It's called coaching (or lack thereof in this instance).
 
Waffle;1312889 said:
They're not concerned. Gibbs ran vanilla game plans all season so the rest of the league wouldn't know what they were going to do in 2007.

Its unbelievable!!! His team ABSOLUTELY sucks and has troubles big time but he comes here to rag on us. Makes no sense at all...
 
The gameplan was good enough to win, Glenn and Romo are the main reasons we lost not Parcells
 
The Bears aired it out and look what that got them.......pretty much the same thing dallas had.......a kick. Sure didn't walk all over the Seahawks like so many would tell you it should have.
 
tsumma;1312648 said:
It just pisses me off even worse, knowing we could be here today playing the bears, but Big Bill and his terrible play calling decided not to even attempt a throw down the field agaist the hawks, which in my opinion was the key , the hawks would of never had a game to save on a botch field goal!!

No need to call people names, but I agree wholeheartedly. I was pretty upset too when I saw the Bears throwing deep on the Seahawks, then to hear Joe Buck say Seattle also thought it was strange we didn't try to attack their secondary.

Conservative may keep you in games but you need to know when to employ it because it can also keep a game closer than it should be and get you beat.
 
if just playing conservative on O gave us a chance to win, imagine if we would have been aggressive... we would have won by 14+ points but instead we are at home watching 4 teams after today playing for the SB...
 
BigDFan5;1312923 said:
The gameplan was good enough to win, Glenn and Romo are the main reasons we lost not Parcells

We seem to be in the minority here.
 
yesfan;1313380 said:
We seem to be in the minority here.

Many of the same complaining about not throwing whined when we threw too much in our three December losses.

I really think some just like to whine.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
465,266
Messages
13,862,366
Members
23,788
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top