We do not win the Seattle game if Mo was one of our top 3 corners

blindzebra

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,560
Reaction score
4,451
Nope that was his man all along. He got caught going inside and thus leaving that man open. i don't know what he was thinking.

Also, if you look back there was a penalty on Mo for illegal contact that helped the Eagles move into the redzone.

No matter how you slice it, Mo had a terrible game. Even he admitted he played badly.

You gotta stop making stuff up. Whats with this blind love for a player that was demoted? You guys are friends?

You are just showing how little you know about the game.

And just when were we playing the Eagles?
 

Kevinicus

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,848
Reaction score
12,633
Mo did not have blanket coverage at all. So your point is moot. Rams picked on him consistently. Thus they were able to score from mostly his side of the ball.

Why do you think that the coaches demoted him? Was it for being a good corner against the Rams?

You asked for stats and I showed it to you.

Now your saying stats lie and its incorrect.

Just face it. There is a reason why coaches benched Mo. It was certainly not for good play in which he was responsible for 17 points. Stats don't lie. Carr was flat out better in this game than Mo.

460x.jpg


You're right, Britt burned him pretty bad on that one.

When did I ask for stats? You took that upon yourself. And provided incorrect stats to boot.

How did Carr look on the first play of the Rams second posession (I think this is one of the plays)? Also look at their first play of the second half.
 

ConstantReboot

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,398
Reaction score
10,066
460x.jpg


You're right, Britt burned him pretty bad on that one.

When did I ask for stats? You took that upon yourself. And provided incorrect stats to boot.

How did Carr look on the first play of the Rams second posession (I think this is one of the plays)? Also look at their first play of the second half.

Incorrect stats as in what? Man, denial is not only a river that flows thru Egypt.

If the stats don't fit you needs grumble to the tv networks. Not me.

So far, this blind support for Mo is amazing and it's really silly.
 

kevm3

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,826
Reaction score
12,862
Can the board stand positivity for at lesat a week? Claiborne is out for the rest of the year, we come off a win and people are still trashing the dude.
 

Kevinicus

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,848
Reaction score
12,633
Incorrect stats as in what? Man, denial is not only a river that flows thru Egypt.

If the stats don't fit you needs grumble to the tv networks. Not me.

So far, this blind support for Mo is amazing and it's really silly.

TV networks are in control of stats now? The TV guys screwed up with a graphic, thus the stat you used (which nobody asked for, and ignores the WHY and HOW of the things - something far more important than the stats themselves). My support is not blind. It's not even really support, I am just countering the blind hatred with some reason and actually pointing to what really happened.
 
Top