We do not win the Seattle game if Mo was one of our top 3 corners

Toruk_Makto

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,242
Reaction score
17,336
They DEMOTED Mo. A demotion means that they were not happy with his performance.

I know that OScan took his place. Read what I stated. I never said that they benched Mo for Moore. I just asked the question if Moore was benched because of poor play. Mo was benched for poor play. Moore hasn't and has played better than Mo since.

What part of they had benched Moore when a healthy Mo was available don't you understand?
 

blindzebra

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,560
Reaction score
4,451
LOL

YOU said stats don't lie.
Then YOU say that stat on Carr for zero completion is wrong.

Pick which point you want to argue. You can't have it both ways and say your right.

I did not say it was a lie. A lie is a deliberate untruth, what it was was some stat guy on the broadcast screwed up. Watch the freaking game they completed multiple throws at Carr.
 

ConstantReboot

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,398
Reaction score
10,067
What part of they had benched Moore when a healthy Mo was available don't you understand?

What part of Mo being benched because of poor play do you not understand?

Even Mo agreed that he deserved to be benched. Read what he said:

After the game Sunday, Claiborne admitted he "stunk it up," adding that "I'm ready to go learn from this tape and get better from it. Like I told the DBs, no matter what the outcome is I can't go out and play like that. If we want to be the No. 1 defense in the league, on my end, I can't go out like that."

The Cowboys agreed.
 

ConstantReboot

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,398
Reaction score
10,067
I did not say it was a lie. A lie is a deliberate untruth, what it was was some stat guy on the broadcast screwed up. Watch the freaking game they completed multiple throws at Carr.

Multiple throws? Show me where.

Certainly not more than Claiborne which got burned consistently.

Fact is Mo got burned more than enough times for them to pick on him. I can attribute at least 17 points against Mo. Even though that stat MAYBE wrong it doesn't disprove the fact Mo had a terrible game worst than Carr. Even to the point they benched him for it. I rewatched the game and Mo was not only a liability in pass defense. He was also a liability against the run. Even he admitted he played terrible. Read what he said.

After the game Sunday, Claiborne admitted he "stunk it up," adding that "I'm ready to go learn from this tape and get better from it. Like I told the DBs, no matter what the outcome is I can't go out and play like that. If we want to be the No. 1 defense in the league, on my end, I can't go out like that."

The Cowboys agreed.
 

blindzebra

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,560
Reaction score
4,451
Multiple throws? Show me where.

Certainly not more than Claiborne which got burned consistently.

Fact is Mo got burned more than enough times for them to pick on him. I can attribute at least 17 points against Mo. Even though that stat MAYBE wrong it doesn't disprove the fact Mo had a terrible game worst than Carr. Even to the point they benched him for it. I rewatched the game and Mo was not only a liability in pass defense. He was also a liability against the run. Even he admitted he played terrible. Read what he said.

After the game Sunday, Claiborne admitted he "stunk it up," adding that "I'm ready to go learn from this tape and get better from it. Like I told the DBs, no matter what the outcome is I can't go out and play like that. If we want to be the No. 1 defense in the league, on my end, I can't go out like that."

The Cowboys agreed.

Where did I say Carr did?

And just for your info, Mo was not the one responsible for that last TD. It was Scandrick's man and when he got picked he covered the guy setting the pick who already was covered. Mo was just in the area and got blamed.
 

dallasdave

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,326
Reaction score
88,063
I don't know if I would go so far as to say it meant the difference between a win and a loss, but I think the defense is better overall without him.

I honestly feel that it is addition by subtraction.

Well said, stay thirsty my friend.
 

Toruk_Makto

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,242
Reaction score
17,336
What part of Mo being benched because of poor play do you not understand?

Even Mo agreed that he deserved to be benched. Read what he said:

After the game Sunday, Claiborne admitted he "stunk it up," adding that "I'm ready to go learn from this tape and get better from it. Like I told the DBs, no matter what the outcome is I can't go out and play like that. If we want to be the No. 1 defense in the league, on my end, I can't go out like that."

The Cowboys agreed.

No where in that quote did it say he felt he deserved to be demoted behind Moore. He was not demoted behind Moore.

How does this confuse you so much?
 

ConstantReboot

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,398
Reaction score
10,067
Where did I say Carr did?

And just for your info, Mo was not the one responsible for that last TD. It was Scandrick's man and when he got picked he covered the guy setting the pick who already was covered. Mo was just in the area and got blamed.

Why would it be Scandricks? They did a switch and Scandrick stuck with his man. Mo didn't switch up and left that man open. Thus no one's fault but his.

Any more excuses for Mo? Seriously, that guy sucked. Can't tackle and can't cover. There is a reason why our defense has improved.
 

ConstantReboot

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,398
Reaction score
10,067
No where in that quote did it say he felt he deserved to be demoted behind Moore. He was not demoted behind Moore.

How does this confuse you so much?

LOL your the one thats confused not me. A demotion is a demotion. What part do you NOT get?

Sorry if you lacking in comprehension now. No sense in me going any further.
 

blindzebra

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,560
Reaction score
4,451
Why would it be Scandricks? They did a switch and Scandrick stuck with his man. Mo didn't switch up and left that man open. Thus no one's fault but his.

Any more excuses for Mo? Seriously, that guy sucked. Can't tackle and can't cover. There is a reason why our defense has improved.

Mo was not covering the guy who set the pick a LB was and he and Scandrick both covered the same guy. Mo had the back corner of the end zone and he was the only one to react to the play.
 

cowboys1981

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,524
Reaction score
4,484
Here's a good question.

What is more damaged?

Mo's knee or reputation?

I hope he comes back strong next season and proves all of his doubters wrong. As long as he wears the star he will have my support.
 

Toruk_Makto

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,242
Reaction score
17,336
LOL your the one thats confused not me. A demotion is a demotion. What part do you NOT get?

Sorry if you lacking in comprehension now. No sense in me going any further.

You have yet to prove the Cowboys thought Moore is better than Mo.
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,453
Reaction score
111,342
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Couldn't disagree with you more. Did you really watch the Rams game?

Rams 1st posession -
Watts 25 yard run on left side. No help from Mo
Austin Petis 1st down play, left side on Mo
Kendric TD on the left side. No help from Mo.

Rams 2nd possession -
Quick 51 yard TD pass against Mo

After the half 2nd possession -
Britt 38 yard pass against Mo
Field Goal

Ram's 2nd to last drive -
Quick illegal contact on Mo - led to 1st and goal
Austin Pettis - TD against Mo

Carr had a great game and pitched a shutout. 4 passes 0 completions.

Down below proves my point. Mo was picked on the entire game which led to his demotion.

brandoncarr.jpg
Great post.
 

ConstantReboot

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,398
Reaction score
10,067
Mo was not covering the guy who set the pick a LB was and he and Scandrick both covered the same guy. Mo had the back corner of the end zone and he was the only one to react to the play.

Nope that was his man all along. He got caught going inside and thus leaving that man open. i don't know what he was thinking.

Also, if you look back there was a penalty on Mo for illegal contact that helped the Eagles move into the redzone.

No matter how you slice it, Mo had a terrible game. Even he admitted he played badly.

You gotta stop making stuff up. Whats with this blind love for a player that was demoted? You guys are friends?
 
Top