TheCount;3928312 said:Value:
9: 1,350
16: 1,000
49: 410
Total: 1,410
So yeah, we would have made out positively on that deal. Not sure why Jerry passed, especially after waiting all that time for an offer before picking Smith.
SDogo;3928297 said:Reports say they offered the same deal to Dallas. I'm Amazed Jerry did not bite. I would of had to think hard about that one but I'm glad Dallas stayed put and took Tyron.
What if they could have gotten Kenrick Ellis, Rahim Moore, or Will Rackley at 49 after getting Aaron Williams at 40.GloryDaysRBack;3928307 said:they did offer us 16+49 for 9 and we rejected it
looking back it would have either been Castonzo or Solder @ 16
glad we didnt make that deal
id much rather have Smith over both
realtick;3928329 said:I would have taken that deal in a NYC second.
The only way to rationalize it is to believe that Dallas really felt Tyron Smith was far away the best player on its board, and not the close 1 (Smith), 1A (Castonzo), 1B (Watt), et cetera, situation that we were led to believe. Perhaps they didn't want to run the risk of losing Tyron somewhere between 10-15.
speedkilz88;3928337 said:What if they could have gotten Kenrick Ellis, Rahim Moore, or Will Rackley at 49 after getting Aaron Williams at 40.
tm1119;3928282 said:Correct? If so, how do you feel about not taking that deal?
speedkilz88;3928296 said:FWST reported it. I wouldn't have minded a move down.
speedkilz88;3928337 said:What if they could have gotten Kenrick Ellis, Rahim Moore, or Will Rackley at 49 after getting Aaron Williams at 40.
DAL @ PHI
LAR ARI
22%
IND TEN
13%
CAR @PHI
10%
