cowboys1981
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,524
- Reaction score
- 4,484
I would use him th way GB uses Cobb. He can even lineup in the backfield and create havoc on the flats. It would keep defenses honest.
Maybe I missed it or didn't see what KC did defensively but why wasn't the matchup for Miles and the slot defender exploited more? Robinson was inactive. KC has some concern about covering that. We could not exploit that? Maybe KC found a solution but I thought for sure we could have taken advantage of that situation.
yeah, we need another guy who could catch 3 yard outs besides Witten
Yeah I said it. One dimensional yes but that one dimension is exactly what would have helped us in both games.
If we're being forced by defense to work underneath he is exactly what we need to do that.
Keep rolling your eyes.. guys like Beasley all over the league are getting it done right now.
The skill set he can bring to this offense is invaluable if we are going to keep dinking and dunking down the field.
Inactive for two games out of two. If we can't use Austin, Harris, Hanna,Dunbar,Escobar for the "dink and dunk" game then the savior Beasley will not make it from a one-dimensional offense to a explosive one.
Harris is the better underneath guy and he needs to play before Beasley.
He's not a better receiver in any aspect than Beasley.
Ehh Beasley is the Dunbar of the WR's. A lot if hype from this board for no apparent reason.
Cole your nephew or something lol? We're talking about a 2 star high school recruit, who was good, not great, against marginal college talent, and an undrafted free agent. Just maybe he's not that good in the NFL? Trust me, I want nothing more than for Cole to succeed as a Cowboy, but you also have to realistic about it.
Yeah I said it. One dimensional yes but that one dimension is exactly what would have helped us in both games.
If we're being forced by defense to work underneath he is exactly what we need to do that.