We Need Beasley

I would use him th way GB uses Cobb. He can even lineup in the backfield and create havoc on the flats. It would keep defenses honest.
 
Maybe I missed it or didn't see what KC did defensively but why wasn't the matchup for Miles and the slot defender exploited more? Robinson was inactive. KC has some concern about covering that. We could not exploit that? Maybe KC found a solution but I thought for sure we could have taken advantage of that situation.

Because Callahan calls an extremely conservative gameplan. We have all the downfield weapons you could ever ask for.. yet we don't utilize them at all.
 
We might have played a top 3 defense on the road here . Give it another week if we struggle next week then panic !
 
yeah, we need another guy who could catch 3 yard outs besides Witten
 
Yeah I said it. One dimensional yes but that one dimension is exactly what would have helped us in both games.

If we're being forced by defense to work underneath he is exactly what we need to do that.

:rolleyes:
 
We need to scrap the 2 TE set and run a 3 Wide with 2 back system. Run it from that personnel like another poster referenced. The 3 wide set can allow us to be more successful in the run game in my opinion. 2 out of the 3 of our tight ends are just clogging up the field in the passing game. And I do agree we need Beasley in, dude's a little person, but he's pretty tough and shifty.
 
Keep rolling your eyes.. guys like Beasley all over the league are getting it done right now.

The skill set he can bring to this offense is invaluable if we are going to keep dinking and dunking down the field.

Inactive for two games out of two. If we can't use Austin, Harris, Hanna,Dunbar,Escobar for the "dink and dunk" game then the savior Beasley will not make it from a one-dimensional offense to a explosive one.
 
Inactive for two games out of two. If we can't use Austin, Harris, Hanna,Dunbar,Escobar for the "dink and dunk" game then the savior Beasley will not make it from a one-dimensional offense to a explosive one.

Agree. They can't utilize the weapons out there now. What makes us think they will all of the sudden use Beasley correctly?

Should he be active and play? Yes
Will he be active and play? Nope, not until an injury occurs with one of the receivers.
 
Harris is the better underneath guy and he needs to play before Beasley.
 
He's not a better receiver in any aspect than Beasley.

Cole your nephew or something lol? We're talking about a 2 star high school recruit, who was good, not great, against marginal college talent, and an undrafted free agent. Just maybe he's not that good in the NFL? Trust me, I want nothing more than for Cole to succeed as a Cowboy, but you also have to realistic about it.
 
Cole your nephew or something lol? We're talking about a 2 star high school recruit, who was good, not great, against marginal college talent, and an undrafted free agent. Just maybe he's not that good in the NFL? Trust me, I want nothing more than for Cole to succeed as a Cowboy, but you also have to realistic about it.

All those words and you didn't explain at all what you think Harris is better at than Cole.

I love Harris.. i think he's a really good returner for us and i want to see him get time in the offense as well.

I just don't see anything he does better than Cole as a pass catcher. Cole brings a unique skillset that none of our other receivers, except maybe Miles, have.
 
Most teams would be happy with a Dez/Austin/Witten/Murray combo platter, but we need diet Danny Amendola?
 
The reason for all of the check downs is our receivers aren't getting open. Beasley is good at getting open, so let's see if he can help out.
 
Yeah I said it. One dimensional yes but that one dimension is exactly what would have helped us in both games.

If we're being forced by defense to work underneath he is exactly what we need to do that.

team can't run the ball consistently to set up play action and you think the problem is we need another smurf receiver on the field........unbelievable..
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,015
Messages
14,506,716
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top