nhcowboysfan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 246
- Reaction score
- 303
I have always had two issues with Quinn's defenses. 1. They lean heavy towards stopping the pass and 2. They are all-or-nothing. They are fun when they are on, but that's predicated on having an early lead. Greg Olson made that point yesterday. That this defense is built on the Cowboys offense scoring often and early. Consider his time with Atlanta. In the 2016 season, Quinn's defenses allowed over 30 points seven times. On three other occasions the opponents scored 28 points twice, and one (the Chiefs) 29 points. Atlanta had a pretty good record that year primarily because their offense scored 30+ points a game and in some instances 40+. That was also the season they lost to the Patriots in the Super Bowl. His defenses cater too much toward hybrid players that can switch between Safety and Linebacker (which is a deficit against stopping the run - point #1). And when they can't get sacks and turnovers their defense is quite pedestrian (point 2). Very rarely, do you ever see this defense get a three-and-out. I would much prefer that, because a defense that forces other teams to punt - rather than relying and hoping for turnovers - is a better overall and more consistent defense.