We need to trade Dak

[Bigdog]

And this is why drugs are bad for you, lol. Seriously why would you trade a top 10 qb who most teams would want. The bigger question is who are you replacing him with. Have you ever heard the grass is not always greener on the other side phrase. I value everyone opinions on this board but sometimes I just shake my head and just say Wow.

 

[Rockport]

The *front office need to trade Dak this off-season. Dak is not a QB that will ever be able to carry this team if we are missing players. If we don't, we will waste another 3 years out of this core and our championship window is closing rapidly. We have the best roster in the NFL and our QB is our bottleneck, like having a great GPU but only reaching minimal efficiency because of an outdated CPU.

Parson is currently on a rookie contract, so we need to make the move that will give us the best chance at the Lombardi. We are going to lose one of our receiver next year, and the Eagles are getting better. It will only get worst after this season.

We need to ban you. Take your trolling *** out of here.

 

[CATCH17]

Said EVERY FREAKIN football coach from pee-wee, to pop warner to high school to college......big fat DUH.

You truly are amazing with all the insight.

Good.. Now hopefully the Cowboys stop asking Dak to carry us and get back to what every freakin pee-wee to pop Warner to high school to college coach knows.

 

[Cowpolk]

Good.. Now hopefully the Cowboys stop asking Dak to carry us and get back to what every freakin pee-wee to pop Warner to high school to college coach knows.

This is the NFL and he is kicking but Wanna see a real QB quit watching pop warner games and watch Dak

 

[Mk2_Cowboys]

The *front office need to trade Dak this off-season. Dak is not a QB that will ever be able to carry this team if we are missing players. If we don't, we will waste another 3 years out of this core and our championship window is closing rapidly. We have the best roster in the NFL and our QB is our bottleneck, like having a great GPU but only reaching minimal efficiency because of an outdated CPU.

Parson is currently on a rookie contract, so we need to make the move that will give us the best chance at the Lombardi. We are going to lose one of our receiver next year, and the Eagles are getting better. It will only get worst after this season.

If cowboys didn’t have Dak they would be a 4-13 team. This roster is terrible 12 good players and the rest garbage.

 

[tico]

Just dropped in to say trash post!
Didn't read a darn thing of this poop

 

[Bullflop]

This opening post is the epitome of all unworthy misconceptions!
Its misled author should rightfully be ignored, forevermore!

 

[JD_KaPow]

The *front office need to trade Dak this off-season. Dak is not a QB that will ever be able to carry this team if we are missing players. If we don't, we will waste another 3 years out of this core and our championship window is closing rapidly. We have the best roster in the NFL and our QB is our bottleneck, like having a great GPU but only reaching minimal efficiency because of an outdated CPU.

Parson is currently on a rookie contract, so we need to make the move that will give us the best chance at the Lombardi. We are going to lose one of our receiver next year, and the Eagles are getting better. It will only get worst after this season.

If only I had more palms with which to facepalm.

 

[GORICO]

The *front office need to trade Dak this off-season. Dak is not a QB that will ever be able to carry this team if we are missing players. If we don't, we will waste another 3 years out of this core and our championship window is closing rapidly. We have the best roster in the NFL and our QB is our bottleneck, like having a great GPU but only reaching minimal efficiency because of an outdated CPU.

Parson is currently on a rookie contract, so we need to make the move that will give us the best chance at the Lombardi. We are going to lose one of our receiver next year, and the Eagles are getting better. It will only get worst after this season.

if it were not for Dak we would not have comeback last game.....if coaches would have chose to kick extra point instead of designing a slow developing play for 2 point conversion that did not fool anyone....we would

have won 34-33 and no overtime?????....please let that sink in....Dak may have made some couple bad throws but i saw a couple easy drops too...and 14 penalties equally-ing 166 yard to the opponent and we still

could have won that game if we chose to kick extra point instead of dumb slow developing play that gave defense so much time to re-adjust.....its small stuff like that ....makes a big deal in the end....if we had won

34-33.....everyone singing different tune

 

[PAPPYDOG]

The *front office need to trade Dak this off-season. Dak is not a QB that will ever be able to carry this team if we are missing players. If we don't, we will waste another 3 years out of this core and our championship window is closing rapidly. We have the best roster in the NFL and our QB is our bottleneck, like having a great GPU but only reaching minimal efficiency because of an outdated CPU.

Parson is currently on a rookie contract, so we need to make the move that will give us the best chance at the Lombardi. We are going to lose one of our receiver next year, and the Eagles are getting better. It will only get worst after this season.

First, he has a no-trade clause.
No team will even give a 4th rounder with that contract of doom that Dak has.
Patience it's just another 3 years of mediocrity......the only Dark/ Bright spot will be seeing Dak trying to make a go of it without all that non/talent around him due to his paycheck......

 

[GORICO]

This opening post is the epitome of all unworthy misconceptions!
Its misled author should rightfully be ignored, forevermore!

mr bullflop--- i tried to say it better than you but did not have words....so i second that motion

 

[GORICO]

He has a no trade clause. That ship has sailed.

All you can do is try to keep putting guys around him because he’s proven if you can start fast he’s a different player.

Oline and run game are crucial for him.

lets back Dak up not tear him down ...that is if you want to see a winning cowboy team

 

[Streifenkarl]

Troll = posts some sh/t and never comes back to his thread.

He threw you a stick and all y'all jumped.

Too bad trolls have a no trade clause too.

 

[Bullflop]

Why? Why? Why? Is this a troll?? I don't understand the dislike for Dak... some think the next Joe Montana is unsigned and just hoping to play for the Cowboys. I am all for legitimate criticism of the team. But, I just don't see why so many feel like Dak is the issue.

Unfortunately, it's just the mindless mantra of the pitifully uninformed CowboysZone Website Malcontent . . .

 

[csirl]

Firstly, no trade clauses are meaningless. The various parties, including the players agent, always discuss potential trades in advance and the clause will be removed if a deal is agreed.

It will cost Dallas to move Dak on. Trade value is less than real value as there is always a risk a player wont gel with the new team. This risk comes with a price.

Also, cap hit is important. Will mean additional cost/credit depending on whether the players cap hit is more/less than perceived value.

So, if you think Dak is a genuine 40m per year QB, you will have to either give away a draft pick or retain some of the cap hit in dead money in order to trade him to a team that believes he's 40m per year.

If you think he's worth only 35m per year (which is still elite money) then you're giving away another draft pick e.g. a 2nd rounder or absorbing an additional $5m per year in dead money in addition to the risk cost in order to trade him.

If other teams value him much less than elite, then you're either absorbing most of his salary in dead money and/or parting with several high draft picks to trade him.

The only potential trade partner I can see is Houston. Need a QB, potentially has the cap space (if Watson moved on). They have a mediocre front office which is under pressure. It could potentially cost us e.g. a first and second rounder to trade him with the full cap hit to the Texans assuming the Texans like him.

 

[noshame]

2 ways this goes.
number one Dak finishes the season strong and we're all happy.

number 2 Dak struggles and he won't have any trade value at all.
Clearly hes got a physical issue. Hopefully it's correctable.

 

[Xeven]

If you want to set the team back at least 4 more years then sure.

 

[starfan1]

If only the mods instituted some type of thread approval function to prevent attention-starved little kids from starting idiotic click-bait threads like this one.

Just kidding. They’re busy making sure nobody mentions a virus that’s practically taken over the world for the last 20 months.

Well to be fair I don’t want to hear about that bullshat on here either. But I agree content such as OP should be moderated at higher frequency but oh well

 

[Cmac]

Is this a cry for Cooper Rush?

 

[Swagger]

if it were not for Dak we would not have comeback last game.....if coaches would have chose to kick extra point instead of designing a slow developing play for 2 point conversion that did not fool anyone....we would

have won 34-33 and no overtime?????....please let that sink in....Dak may have made some couple bad throws but i saw a couple easy drops too...and 14 penalties equally-ing 166 yard to the opponent and we still

could have won that game if we chose to kick extra point instead of dumb slow developing play that gave defense so much time to re-adjust.....its small stuff like that ....makes a big deal in the end....if we had won

34-33.....everyone singing different tune

We didn't come back in the last game. We lost again.