We won the bye

[iceberg]

I've already made my point. You just don't want to hear or see it. We have a very weak minded team this year that can't overcome adversity. I've watched 3 games this year where this team looks like it just flat gave up. Winning the 1st half means nothing. I also simply stated that other teams have lost starting QB's and can still win a few games until they get their QB back. You say I gave a "singular" example when in fact I cited 3 examples of teams winning with injuries or without their starting QB's. Quit reading so much into it. Winning is the bottom line and we're not doing it.....

3 WHOLE games?

and yes you cited 3 teams but each for a different reason as if each reason was building off the other when in fact it was just scattershot responses from the hip every time someone shot down said argument.

green bay had major injuries!!! WE SHOULD OVERCOME TOO!!! (even though this trivializes all other teams and their injuries you can point to ONE success and cite that the ONLY reason they won was their uncanny ability to withstand injuries and keep on truckin) and then you were told their QB wasn't the one hurt for an extended period of time.

instead of staying with the GB argument you so cleverly built up in your own mind, if not reality, you ran to pittsburgh to say BUT ROTH IS HURT SO I'M RIGHT even though that is yet again a completely different situation, you tied it to the same for no other need than your own and went AH HA! right again!

and i'm sure let everyone around the water cooler at work know of your online brilliance.

now i'm just wetting myself in laughter when you say "don't read so much into it" when that's what you did, several times, on why we're NOT winning and came up with the ONLY ANSWER POSSIBLE TO MANKIND in that we're just a weak minded team.

OF WHICH i'm sure you were out to say from the start, so congrats.

took you a hell of a long time and many misfires on your examples, but congrats. you got there.

where ever *there* is.

have a day.

 

[ksadler1]

3 WHOLE games?

and yes you cited 3 teams but each for a different reason as if each reason was building off the other when in fact it was just scattershot responses from the hip every time someone shot down said argument.

green bay had major injuries!!! WE SHOULD OVERCOME TOO!!! (even though this trivializes all other teams and their injuries you can point to ONE success and cite that the ONLY reason they won was their uncanny ability to withstand injuries and keep on truckin) and then you were told their QB wasn't the one hurt for an extended period of time.

instead of staying with the GB argument you so cleverly built up in your own mind, if not reality, you ran to pittsburgh to say BUT ROTH IS HURT SO I'M RIGHT even though that is yet again a completely different situation, you tied it to the same for no other need than your own and went AH HA! right again!

and i'm sure let everyone around the water cooler at work know of your online brilliance.

now i'm just wetting myself in laughter when you say "don't read so much into it" when that's what you did, several times, on why we're NOT winning and came up with the ONLY ANSWER POSSIBLE TO MANKIND in that we're just a weak minded team.

OF WHICH i'm sure you were out to say from the start, so congrats.

took you a hell of a long time and many misfires on your examples, but congrats. you got there.

where ever *there* is.

have a day.

Yea you really shut me down there.....Do you sell cars for a living?.....
I take it you don't think 3 losses is a big deal?

 

[big dog cowboy]

I'm not saying losing Romo hasn't been huge but this team has no guts when it comes down to crunch time. We are 0-3 without Romo.

That is one part of the reason.

 

[ksadler1]

That is one part of the reason.

Absolutely.....

 

[iceberg]

Yea you really shut me down there.....Do you sell cars for a living?.....
I take it you don't think 3 losses is a big deal?

i take it you can't comprehend for a living so you make up **** for others and pretend they said that?

ie - i never said a thing about losing 3 times and how i felt about it. i said your arguments are scattershot and emotionally based void of anything that could pass for a fact outside of "yes those players play football also".

 

[fifaguy]

I thought of it more like this division is weak and even with this team in their 3rd QB we still have a shot

Yes. Would be nice to win again, starting on Sunday...

 

[cowboys1981]

Beat NY and it gives more life to the team moving forward. Our next four opponents have been inconsistent this season as well with their starting QBs. The only opponent left on our schedule that is explosive on that side of the ball is GB. We can do this.

 

[Manster68]

Get that defense going after the QB - maybe they just might get a few take-a-ways.

Get that offensive line opening up some holes for the power running game - then stretch the field and get the ball in the end zone!

Let's see if the receivers can get open for Cassel - and then make plays.

If Dallas' defense is what I think it is, this team is about to go on a long winning streak.

 

[cowboys1981]

Get that defense going after the QB - maybe they just might get a few take-a-ways.

Get that offensive line opening up some holes for the power running game - then stretch the field and get the ball in the end zone!

Let's see if the receivers can get open for Cassel - and then make plays.

If Dallas' defense is what I think it is, this team is about to go on a long winning streak.

I hear ya. We've been accustomed to having our offense carry us for years and now that it falls on our defense fans remain rightfully skeptical until they're proven wrong. I see this defense getting some TOs due to creating pressure and setting the tone for our offense. Winning vs NY will give this team the confidence it needs.