Week 1 vs Jets Notes/Prediction

[SaltwaterServr]

And still, no one drafted him. What does that tell you?

Tom Brady is going to be a crappy to marginally effective quarterback since he was drafted at the *** end of the 6th round after every team had chance after chance to pick him up? The same guy that barely made the team as their fourth stringer?

That the trail you're sniffing on there paht-nah?

 

[rcaldw]

I predict more of what we saw last season after Garrett took over.

I predict some times in the game where it looks like we are in big trouble. People posting in the game thread on this board will be saying that Garrett is predictable, WHY, WHY, WHY, WHY in a million different forms.

But when the end of the game comes around it will be right there for us to take.

I predict a tight Cowboys victory. Won't venture a score, but I think we pull the surprise and win.

 

[BlueCowboy24]

Didn't that trade get the Bucs Josh Freeman from the Browns through the Jets?

If it did, OUCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[RastaRocket]

Tom Brady is going to be a crappy to marginally effective quarterback since he was drafted at the *** end of the 6th round after every team had chance after chance to pick him up? The same guy that barely made the team as their fourth stringer?

That the trail you're sniffing on there paht-nah?

Dude your crazy, I'd take Ryan Leaf and Jamarcus Russell any day over that Brady guy.

If it did, OUCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh it did.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_NFL_Draft

 

[Hostile]

Didn't that trade get the Bucs Josh Freeman from the Browns through the Jets?

Yes it did.

 

[jimmyxx7]

I've WATCHED Sanchez play in those playoff games and the offense is just bogged down by his (majority of the time) horrible decision making.

Well, either you haven't watched the games, or you don't know football. He has a 94.3 career playoff rating with 9 TDs and 3 INTs. Say whatever you like about his performance in the regular season thus far, but there's no denying that he's been a very good playoff quarterback.

Career playoff wins:

Mark Sanchez: four by age 24.
Tony Romo: one by age 31.

 

[RastaRocket]

Well, either you haven't watched the games, or you don't know football because he has a 94.3 career playoff rating with 9 TDs and 3 INTs. Say whatever you like about his performance in the regular season thus far, but there's no denying that he's been a very good playoff quarterback.

Career playoff wins:

Mark Sanchez: four by age 24.
Tony Romo: one by age 31.

And we all know 1 player does not give a team the victory. The Jets awesome defense is the main reason for those 4 playoff wins. I've watched those games; the Jets struggle down the field on offense. He may have TD's but he has only had 2 playoff games in which he threw for 200+ yards and never had a game over 300 yards (best was 257).

Let's just say you never traded up for Sanchez (1st and 2nd round pick) and had Freeman. Would the Jets be in a better or worse position?

 

[BlueCowboy24]

Well, either you haven't watched the games, or you don't know football. He has a 94.3 career playoff rating with 9 TDs and 3 INTs. Say whatever you like about his performance in the regular season thus far, but there's no denying that he's been a very good playoff quarterback.

Career playoff wins:

Mark Sanchez: four by age 24.
Tony Romo: one by age 31.

LMAO! if Romo had that DEFENSE he'd have won a SuperBowl by now! Be honest with yourself guy, what's the one question about the Jets......wait for it............SANCHEZ! plug Romo in and you guys would have some hardware by now. He has everything around him he needs to get a ring and he has just as many as Romo right now.

Guess what, Flaco has been there also and it's not because of his play at the qb position, its because of his DEFENSE!

Ben got to the superbowl his 1st season and won, why, DEFENSE.

Lets see how many times Mark Sanception gets to the playoffs and loses and stays the QB of the Jets. Rex even wanted to Bench the guy last year so go argue with your HC before you come over here with that.

 

[jimmyxx7]

And we all know 1 player does not give a team the victory. The Jets awesome defense is the main reason for those 4 playoff wins.

Again, he threw 9TDS to 3 INTs with a rating near 95 in six ROAD playoff games, so he was a big contributor. Admittedly, he isn't as good a quarterback as Tony Romo right now, but he's already a much better clutch performer. Consider this: during regular season play, Romo has a career 95.5 passer rating and a tremendous 8.0 YPA as against Sanchez's lowly 70.2 rating and 6.5 YPA. But in the playoffs, Romo's rating drops to 80.8, and his YPA drops to 6.2 while Sanchez's rating rises to 94.3 and his YPA rises to 7.4. Romo comes up small in the playoffs, whereas Sanchez gets better.

Let's just say you never traded up for Sanchez (1st and 2nd round pick) and had Freeman. Would the Jets be in a better or worse position?

Well, that's a ridiculous question because you're assuming they would have taken Freeman. You can't do that. The better, more reasonable question is whether they'd be better off had they not made the trade for Sanchez and done whatever it was that they were going to do had they not been able to get Sanchez, whether it was keep Brett Favre or sign someone else or draft a different quarterback. The answer? Who knows. They'd have had to win the Super Bowl one of the past two years to be in better shape than they were with Sanchez.

 

[Go Big D!]

Career playoff wins:

Mark Sanchez: four by age 24.
Tony Romo: one by age 31.

Well that settles it! Dilfer is a better QB than Marino.
Thank you for clearing that up. That debate has been raging for years. Glad you came along.

 

[BlueCowboy24]

Well that settles it! Dilfer is a better QB than Marino.
Thank you for clearing that up. That debate has been raging for years. Glad you came along.

Beautiful.

Only one way to describe that...

(Kelso voice)
You have the right to remain BUUUUUURN!

 

[PTonyN]

And we all know 1 player does not give a team the victory. The Jets awesome defense is the main reason for those 4 playoff wins. I've watched those games; the Jets struggle down the field on offense. He may have TD's but he has only had 2 playoff games in which he threw for 200+ yards and never had a game over 300 yards (best was 257).

Let's just say you never traded up for Sanchez (1st and 2nd round pick) and had Freeman. Would the Jets be in a better or worse position?

what has josh freeman proven? and you dont need 300 yards to have a good game. thats just a number.

 

[RastaRocket]

what has josh freeman proven? and you dont need 300 yards to have a good game. thats just a number.

He's proven he's a better QB than Sanchez thats for sure.

You guys seriously can't be this high on Sanchez? He is the reason you haven't been to a SB. Watching that offense try and move the ball is awful; and look at all the pieces he has around him it's ridiculous how bad he plays with that O-Line and Receivers. Especially for a #5 trade up pick and a 2nd round on top of that.

 

[jimmyxx7]

LMAO! if Romo had that DEFENSE he'd have won a SuperBowl by now!

You're acting as if Romo played well in those games and got let down by the cowboys' defense. Face it: Romo has been very mediocre in the playoffs, and that's why the Cowboys haven't won anything under his stewardship. The defense didn't blow the seattle game in 06 or the giants game in 07. Romo was mediocre in both games; that's why they lost. And in the Minny game from 09, they scored THREE points!

Guess what, Flaco has been there also and it's not because of his play at the qb position, its because of his DEFENSE!

Flacco has a career playoff rating of 61.6 in six games. That's being carried by your defense. But Sanchez's is 94.3. That's being a contributor.

Lets see how many times Mark Sanception

Oh, God, that's so witty. Did you spend all night coming up with that?

gets to the playoffs and loses and stays the QB of the Jets.

He's has four times the number of playoff wins that Romo has, and he's six years younger. So if Mark Sanchez should be removed for going 4-2 in the playoffs, what should happen to Romo for going 1-3?

 

[jimmyxx7]

Well that settles it! Dilfer is a better QB than Marino.

Are you actually comparing Tony Romo to Dan Marino? Aside from being a much better player, Marino went to a Super Bowl. Romo's never even gotten out of the divisional round.

 

[CowboyMcCoy]

I think some young guys make big plays. We'll see the usual Witten and Romo combo. I'm thinking a pick for Scandrick?

I'm excited about seeing this offensive line in action.

 

[PTonyN]

He's proven he's a better QB than Sanchez thats for sure.

You guys seriously can't be this high on Sanchez? He is the reason you haven't been to a SB. Watching that offense try and move the ball is awful; and look at all the pieces he has around him it's ridiculous how bad he plays with that O-Line and Receivers. Especially for a #5 trade up pick and a 2nd round on top of that.

in every single afc champ game he has played very well. the defense is what played awful.

 

[nalam]

You're acting as if Romo played well in those games and got let down by the cowboys' defense. Face it: Romo has been very mediocre in the playoffs, and that's why the Cowboys haven't won anything under his stewardship. The defense didn't blow the seattle game in 06 or the giants game in 07. Romo was mediocre in both games; that's why they lost. And in the Minny game from 09, they scored THREE points!

Seattle game - Bill P played it by the ear instead of all out attack on the secondary, even then we were in a position to win with the FG ,but even after FG mishap if our D held for a 3 and out we would be in a field position to another FG with a couple of short throws. but the D let the RB Alexander to a long run and first down.

Giants game we had an upper hand for almost all first half before the 30 sec TD let by D again. And after the half also they let a score , the tide turned then.

Minny game - I'll give that to you, there was no OL on that game. Even in that game our D gave great(sic) Favre superlative QB rating with long touchdowns to S.Rice and Harvin.

Basically if our D is like the Stealers or Rvens we could have sniffed a SB atleast with our offense.

 

[BlueCowboy24]

You're acting as if Romo played well in those games and got let down by the cowboys' defense. Face it: Romo has been very mediocre in the playoffs, and that's why the Cowboys haven't won anything under his stewardship. The defense didn't blow the seattle game in 06 or the giants game in 07. Romo was mediocre in both games; that's why they lost. And in the Minny game from 09, they scored THREE points!

Flacco has a career playoff rating of 61.6 in six games. That's being carried by your defense. But Sanchez's is 94.3. That's being a contributor.

Oh, God, that's so witty. Did you spend all night coming up with that?

He's has four times the number of playoff wins that Romo has, and he's six years younger. So if Mark Sanchez should be removed for going 4-2 in the playoffs, what should happen to Romo for going 1-3?

Go watch the highlights of the vikings D in that game our O line was horrible, now on the other hand Sanchez has an very good O line and time to make good decisions and still hasn't won anything, oh wait he has 4 playoff wins in 2 years and still doesn't have a ring yet, how great a QB he must be.

Again with the stat thing, all that proves is that Sanchez was really good in those LOSES!


No just as long as it took you to Google those stats


It's a TEAM game, Sanchez isn't the sole reason the Jets have gotten to the AFC champ game the last two years, but Romo isn't the sole reason the Cowboys haven't been anywhere either. So that's the TRUTH, swallow it!

 

[RastaRocket]

In defense to Romo vs. Seattle.... we would have never even sniffed the playoffs if he didn't come in half way through that season.