Week 3 inactives **Prediction**

[blindzebra]

haha


Pile not dressing! That leaves 2 Safeties dressed. Thats pretty self defeating and short sighted......

We are going to really attack 49ers. You will be wrong AGAIN on Price. He dresses no brainer.

Its Ogs or Als - Gametime.

Fowler is out, we going with 7 LBs? Now that is funny.

Did Price play week one? Nope. Did he help us week two? Nope.

Where was all the no-huddle Nors?

 

[Reality]

Pile not dressing! That leaves 2 Safeties dressed. Thats pretty self defeating and short sighted......

I thought Parcells said Jones has been working at safety? Isn't he going to be active? Seems like 3 safeties to me ..

 

[blindzebra]

I thought Parcells said Jones has been working at safety? Isn't he going to be active? Seems like 3 safeties to me ..

Reeves has also been working at safety, so we have 4 active.

 

[Hostile]

My head is spinning from all this math.

 

[Nors]

Fowler is out, we going with 7 LBs? Now that is funny.

Did Price play week one? Nope. Did he help us week two? Nope.

Where was all the no-huddle Nors?

We played 3 wide sets, 4 wide sets and Bledsoe in the shotgun some. Its coming!


Safeties blew the game last week - not Price. Unforgiveable to allow plays like that over the top in a critical part of game - twice.

 

[Nors]

Reeves has also been working at safety, so we have 4 active.

Safety offseason implosion in full force. Yet you and Hos defend it! Classic!

Now after you throw the great Pile under the bus! You retort to Jones and Reeves!

Jones I read recently getting reps at Safety, But if thatis our backup Safety plan - thats poor roster mgmt in offseason. It can't be any more clear than that!

 

[Reality]

Safety offseason implosion in full force. Yet you and Hos defend it! Classic!

Now after you throw the great Pile under the bus! You retort to Jones and Reeves!

Jones I read recently getting reps at Safety, But if thatis our backup Safety plan - thats poor roster mgmt in offseason. It can't be any more clear than that!

Nors, who said Reeves and Jones were our next great safeties? This is classic Nors here .. you state there would be only two safeties dressing for the game and when people say there are actually more (translation .. NORS WAS WRONG), you try to turn it around like they're hailing the other players as saviors.

.. and I know .. Reality sucks ... *rollseyes*

-Reality

 

[Rack]

Yeah that's real intelligent thinking...

We're already short 1 LB with Fowler out. Plus Burnett is still recovering from surgery. He may not be ready to go. That's 2. Yet we're gonna go ahead and deactivate ANOTHER LB?

Not only is Al Singleton gonna be actived, and not only is he gonna play, but he's gonna START as well.


You want a prediction? I predict Nors is gonna keep up his Al Singleton agenda until the end of the season.

 

[Rack]

NORS WAS WRONG

And you'd think he'd be use to it by now.

 

[blindzebra]

We played 3 wide sets, 4 wide sets and Bledsoe in the shotgun some. Its coming!


Safeties blew the game last week - not Price. Unforgiveable to allow plays like that over the top in a critical part of game - twice.

You keep leaving out the truth, big surprise.

All your talk is about safety depth and FS, yet which back up or FS cost us the game again?

Per Parcells it was our nickel corner's fault, so where does that leave your argument?

Where most of them go, in the toilet.

 

[fortdick]

Why would Henson be inactive? I thought you could carry 45 plus a third QB? Henson would be the third QB, wouldn't he?

 

[Hostile]

Yeah that's real intelligent thinking...

We're already short 1 LB with Fowler out. Plus Burnett is still recovering from surgery. He may not be ready to go. That's 2. Yet we're gonna go ahead and deactivate ANOTHER LB?

Not only is Al Singleton gonna be actived, and not only is he gonna play, but he's gonna START as well.


You want a prediction? I predict Nors is gonna keep up his Al Singleton agenda until the end of the season.

Not only will he keep this agenda all year but in the off season when Al is actually let go he will remind us all how "right" he was.

 

[Hostile]

Why would Henson be inactive? I thought you could carry 45 plus a third QB? Henson would be the third QB, wouldn't he?

The 3rd QB is always inactive. They can be brought into the game though inactive, but the 2 ahead cannot go back in regardless what happens to #3.

 

[blindzebra]

Yeah that's real intelligent thinking...

We're already short 1 LB with Fowler out. Plus Burnett is still recovering from surgery. He may not be ready to go. That's 2. Yet we're gonna go ahead and deactivate ANOTHER LB?

Not only is Al Singleton gonna be actived, and not only is he gonna play, but he's gonna START as well.


You want a prediction? I predict Nors is gonna keep up his Al Singleton agenda until the end of the season.

Actually it won't end there. It will go until the day he is finally released or traded, and then he will tell us, "I told you so!!"

 

[Hostile]

Actually it won't end there. It will go until the day he is finally released or traded, and then he will tell us, "I told you so!!"

There's an echo in here.

 

[blindzebra]

There's an echo in here.

You just typed faster.

More proof of our conspiracy, I'm sure.

 

[fortdick]

The 3rd QB is always inactive. They can be brought into the game though inactive, but the 2 ahead cannot go back in regardless what happens to #3.

Thanks for clearing that up for me. So saying Henson will be inactive is a bold, yet equivocal, statement.

 

[Nors]

At least you see the writing on the wall.....

 

[BigDFan5]

Al inactive LMAO yes lets make all our starters inactive how about it?

 

[Nors]

All starters inactive - thats absurd. I'm advocating benching a non producer.

A guy that made ZERO tackles last week? Fujita and Burnett in the wings - thats starting to loom as a decision.....

Same BS when I called 3-4, Hybrids, Romo, Right Side of Oline sucked last year(some here actually tried to debate that bad boy!)

Its not if, but when. Als sucks.