We'll never have to worry about Kevin Kolb

[Howboutdemcowboys31]

Went to Eagles training camp. I may not be a pro scout, but I know throwing 4 interceptions against the second team defense in a hour in a half practice isnt good.

 

[Rampage]

speaking of interceptions If we have another terrible year with low int numbers do you guys think Campo is gone?

 

[EPL0c0]

speaking of interceptions If we have another terrible year with low int numbers do you guys think Campo is gone?

This made me think: which is better: lead the league in sacks or lead the league in INTs?

I think if Campo's fired, it'll be part of a bigger coaching overhaul instead of an individual decision on his status.

 

[Howboutdemcowboys31]

I think pics and sacks are equally as important. Sacks lead to 3rd and longs, which lead to easier picks.

Back to the topic though, Kolb looked terrible and had his head down all day. I love it.

 

[reddyuta]

INTs are way more important ofcourse.forget INTs,lets get some turnovers for a change.

 

[Clarkson]

This made me think: which is better: lead the league in sacks or lead the league in INTs?

I think if Campo's fired, it'll be part of a bigger coaching overhaul instead of an individual decision on his status.

INTs are better. They give you ball for sure. Sacks can lead to it. INTs do it.

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

This made me think: which is better: lead the league in sacks or lead the league in INTs?

I think if Campo's fired, it'll be part of a bigger coaching overhaul instead of an individual decision on his status.

Why in hades would we want to get rid of Campo. Scandrick was awesome last year and Jenkins is developing very well.

Campo gets credit for that.

 

[Apollo Creed]

Why in hades would we want to get rid of Campo. Scandrick was awesome last year and Jenkins is developing very well.

Campo gets credit for that.

When you get that much pressure on the QB, and you don't generate hardly any picks - the finger has to get pointed somewhere.

 

[ThreeSportStar80]

INT's are always more important because they give the ball back to the offense... Sacks don't always lead to getting the back to the offense.

 

[EPL0c0]

INT's are always more important because they give the ball back to the offense... Sacks don't always lead to getting the back to the offense.

I looked up some numbers and this is a bit funny...

In 2008,
Sacks: 1-Dallas 30-Cleveland
INTs: 2-Cleveland 30-Dallas

Sacks don't necessarily lead to more INTs. Sure there are lots of other factors (weather, QB intelligence (or lack of), etc) but just strange how you have 2 teams on opposite ends of the spectrum in those two catagories.

 

[Four]

I don't care if we get interceptions or sacks as long as we win.

 

[SaltwaterServr]

When you get that much pressure on the QB, and you don't generate hardly any picks - the finger has to get pointed somewhere.

Possibly 5 different starting combinations at safety?

 

[TheCount]

I don't know why but the OP has me laughing out loud. Wow.