Well Prescott is consistent in one thing

TequilaCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,944
Reaction score
8,440
Agreed.

Half (7) of Dak's 14 Interceptions are clearly on our receivers, but it's frustrating to see how many of our fellow agenda-driven posters don't accurately acknowledge that.

So, in reality, Dak has only thrown 7 Interceptions to date that are on him. That's not bad at all.

So should we count also those dropped by opponents...or do we ignore those and chalk those up on divine intervention. ?
 

Twin928

Well-Known Member
Messages
579
Reaction score
377
:muttley: Aren't you the one who after the Bucs game proclaimed to the world that Dak sucks?

Now we compare vomiting to Prescott's play on the field.
Yes, I can see those two being equivalent!:muttley:
Yea that was him saying dak sucks and the season was over
 

Qcard

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,569
Reaction score
8,159
Who else had a special routine,
Remember, a guy named Bill Russell for the Celtics. He would have to vomit before each game.
Prescott new thing is interception. And then he’s perfect. Sarcasm for those who don’t get it.

Let’s try not to make this about our quarterback. Who else in sports history have a special routine that you recall
Rod Strickland NBA Guard. Ate Hotdogs during games :lmao2::lmao2:
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,888
Reaction score
48,677
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
True, but how many have been flat out dropped by the defense?Quite a few.
Dak has had some twrrible luck with some of his picks, but youre right.
Cant honestly mention picks that should not have happened without mentioning those that didnt happen,but should have.
 

DallasDW00ds0n

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,116
Reaction score
11,550
Give me a break. If you watched that game and said to yourself Dak is THE issue, do us a favor, don’t write in the forum.
 

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,153
Reaction score
28,699
The big difference being you can work around boneheaded ints against a 7-8 team with half their starters missing and a QB who was on the Lions practice squad a month or two ago

In the playoffs against good competition that dog won't hunt. Therein lies the problem

this was a RS road game, has ZERO to do with the playoff game..its week to week league all games are ONE OFF but yet that ONE int should have been high and outside and it was a bad throw.

please don't step in here and blame his for the other 2 T/OS Biadasz got knocked back at the snap all game mostly by that huge Tart dude and the exchange was messed up and Hendershots INT another WR causing an INT when the pass hit him perfectly. Lets stop blaming Dak for the T/O issues..
where was the run game, this game became one dimensional and thats an issue as well.

a 10 point spread on the road and we won by 14 not playing well..id say that not all bad..

they won.. dog don't need to hunt until its brought into the woods,, thats in 2 weeks.

we can discus thta game when its actually played. the injured to Tyler, Zach limped a lot, dak limped a lot, and Sam Williams all a concern.

if the Washington game has no meaning, no core payers need to play that game at all..too many close calls on those injuries.

thats my take on the game the injuries front and center no pun intended are only only concern, the games over its W nothing else matters.
 

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,153
Reaction score
28,699
They just put up 40 on one of the best teams in football, after one of the most bone headed INT's of Dak's career. So I'm not sure what problem you're getting at...

*Especially counting the fact that half his INT's werent on him.
:hammer:100% the overactions as expected are ridiculous. 10 point spread won by 14 with mistakes.:popcorn:
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,768
Reaction score
50,252
So should we count also those dropped by opponents...or do we ignore those and chalk those up on divine intervention. ?
Drops are not catches. What don't you understand about that? Should we count drops our receivers made that hit them square in their hands, which ultimately hurts Dak's accuracy/completions % and passer rating as well, or does that affect your stupid anti-Dak agenda?

Quit being stupid.
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,768
Reaction score
50,252
Dak now has 14 interceptions. Even Romo only had 3 seasons of 14 or more interceptions but at least It took Romo 16 games to reach that. Dak has 2 more games to see if he can match Tony’s big year
2 more games? SMDH

It's "1" more game, hater!
 

RonnieT24

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,406
Reaction score
22,803
:muttley:
He did suck. That doesn’t mean he sucks. Learn the difference my cowboy brother. Thanks for following the instructions. :muttley:

Dak only sucked for a couple of throws. I still cannot bring myself to fault him for another receiver thinking he's playing beach volleyball and upon rewatch I clearly see that the botched snap never got off Biadasz's butt. Biadasz was getting his arse whupped by Tart so maybe he had other things on his mind.. but overall Dak had a pretty good game. Especially considering no running game and relatively poor protection. By my count we had 2 drops by Brown, one by Schultz, one by Gallup and the killer from Hendershot. Did I miss anybody.. The offense had its struggles for stretches last night.. but by and large most of it wasn't on the QB..
 

Havic

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,376
Reaction score
8,706
I swear, someone has to be f'ing with Prescott's sleep number setting with the number of INT's he has reached.
 
Top