dallasfaniac;1724266 said:It doesn't matter if he has receivers open down the field, what matters is if they were open during his read.
If Witten is open down the field when Romo looks at him, should he turn to look at Owens to see if he can get the TD pass or just get the ball to Witten for the sure first down and avoid a possible sack?
Halftime adjustments allow the coach to look at those plays and call ones where Owens is earlier/later in the progression.
You can't always look at an open receiver and assume they are open either. There may be a safety within roaming range, or an offensive linemen in the window that may tip the pass. I could argue that Romo doesn't check down often enough either and prefers to go down the field with it.
Crown Royal;1724274 said:On one of the plays Hurd was open, I noticed it only because I felt that he was a good option. They were showing cover 2, and hurd had crayton next to him in the slot. Knowing that, if crayton is running an inside route, he is going to take the short zone with him, leaving Hurd to contend with the safety only. Hurd ran a streak, but was looking for the ball early because it was a short drop. He was open all day, and was an excellent quick read, but Romo never saw it.
dallasfaniac;1724281 said:Which order in the progression was Hurd?
dallasfaniac;1724266 said:It doesn't matter if he has receivers open down the field, what matters is if they were open during his read.
If Witten is open down the field when Romo looks at him, should he turn to look at Owens to see if he can get the TD pass or just get the ball to Witten for the sure first down and avoid a possible sack?
Halftime adjustments allow the coach to look at those plays and call ones where Owens is earlier/later in the progression.
You can't always look at an open receiver and assume they are open either. There may be a safety within roaming range, or an offensive linemen in the window that may tip the pass. I could argue that Romo doesn't check down often enough either and prefers to go down the field with it.
I agree to an extent. I don't want to see throws into double and triple coverage, but I thought we left the "play it conservative" offense behind last year. Yes, we got burned against the bills but you have one of those games every year. It's not the same offense we saw the first four games of the year since then. What happened to the "let players make plays" philosophy?conner01;1724294 said:it was nice to see he learned the lesson of the bills game. take the underneath guy if the deep guy is covered.
i love to go down field but i would rather see a dump off than a bad play down field. against the bills he tried to force too many down field
Chreph;1724328 said:I agree to an extent. I don't want to see throws into double and triple coverage, but I thought we left the "play it conservative" offense behind last year. Yes, we got burned against the bills but you have one of those games every year. It's not the same offense we saw the first four games of the year since then. What happened to the "let players make plays" philosophy?
Also, does anyone recall a play in which TO was not covered? It might have been my angle, but I remember seeing TO lined up with no CB in front of him. MN came with the blitz and either got a sack or incomplete pass (don't remember). That should have been noticed in the pre-snap read and the route adjusted to take advantage. Again, I couldn't believe they would let TO line up by himself and get away with it so I just wanted to see if anyone else noticed that or if I saw something too good to be true.
Bob Sacamano;1724317 said:I trust that Romo is in a better position than any one of us to determine who is open and who is not
btw, why is all of a sudden Romo's not spreading the ball around like he was earlier? maybe it has to do w/ the fact that not everyone is open
Crown Royal;1724344 said:You're right. Obviously, the league's worst pass defense just learned to play better, and WRs crayton and Hurd have stopped getting open even when TO is doubled. It is ridiculous to think that maybe Romo is a bit too comfortable with witten.
Chreph;1724220 said:I don't think so, the only thing I saw was Jason Witten.
-Tony Romo
lol j/k I was at the game and got a little frustrated by all the check downs to MB3 and Witten - before the hamstring incident. I can remember at least two plays he had TO for a big gain (or TD if he hit him in stride) and could only watch as Romo had his eyes locked on # 82. Don't get me wrong, it's great that they have chemistry and Witten is a weapon that must be utilized, but sometimes the dink and dumps are frustrating when you're not putting points on the board and passing up opportunities for big plays.
OT - for people who regularly go to games, does Newman always work out with the receivers before games? He was running routes with TO, Crayton, Hurd, and Austin catching balls from Tony. I think it'd be a great idea to send him out on offense to run a streak every now and then to confuse the defense and run a draw play for JJ.