SkinsandTerps;1056888 said:
Why ? Rodman was never the biggest star player on his team that TO is (regardless of his abilities).
It's irrelevant whether or not Rodman was a star. All the actions which he undertook to attract attention to himself and how the media and/or public reacted to his actions are relevant. One doesn't have to be the 'most popular' within a group to be noticed more by others.
SkinsandTerps;1056888 said:
Although most of you think that Bledsoe/Newman/Williams is the star, you have to realize that once TO signed he became the star of the team (outside of Bill and Jerry of course).
That's not exactly true. Usually, for team sports that is, all starting players are the 'stars'. Of course, some may be called SUPERstars. If you're implying that Owens became the superstar of the team upon his arrival, I would agree with you.
SkinsandTerps;1056888 said:
Rodman was the star in search of superstardom behind Jordan, Thomas, Robinson, Shaq, Kobe, Pippen, etc...
...and whether he succeeded or failed to achieve 'superstardom' is not the point.
How he was promoted or vilified by those who observed his actions is the point. Rodman wasn't a superstar. Owens is a superstar. Their 'levels of stardom' does not prevent me from comparing the two men.