Hostile;1982147 said:I would still love for the Commanders to let Shawn Springs go. He'd be a great 3rd CB. I would still want to draft a CB in round 1.
Don't know on Dyson honestly. I wouldn't hate it. I wouldn't be all giddy about it either.stasheroo;1982160 said:Hos, I wanted Springs as well, but it looks like the Commanders found a way to keep him.
What do you think of Dyson?
I think he lacks the strength and durability to be a #1 cornerback, but I think his size, speed and ball-skills would make for an ideal #3.
That was kind of funny, but Springs wasn't a Pro Bowler in 2000.Bach;1982156 said:Springs would be great. Throw in Dunn and Zach and we're on our way to recreating the 2000 Pro Bowl.
It fell flat for me since Thomas has gone to the 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2005, and 2006 pro bowls.Hostile;1982216 said:That was kind of funny, but Springs wasn't a Pro Bowler in 2000.
I could definitely appreciate what Bach was saying. I disagree with him a bit though. I think this team could use some veteran voices like Zach Thomas, Warrick Dunn, and Shawn Springs. All are very respected for their work ethics. Dunn is a credit to any community he lives in. Are they my ideal signings? Of course not.speedkilz88;1982243 said:It fell flat for me since Thomas has gone to the 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2005, and 2006 pro bowls.
Springs by the way did play in the 1998 probowl.
Hostile;1982251 said:I could definitely appreciate what Bach was saying. I disagree with him a bit though. I think this team could use some veteran voices like Zach Thomas, Warrick Dunn, and Shawn Springs. All are very respected for their work ethics. Dunn is a credit to any community he lives in. Are they my ideal signings? Of course not.
I really like the Zach Thomas signing. He was cheap and he will be a great example.
Given my choice I'd address RB in the Draft not Free Agency.
Given my choice I'd trade for Roy Williams of Detroit, not us a day 1 pick on a WR.
My choices rarely matter in the grand scheme of things though. If they did Barbere would be backing up Stephen Jackson.
Tobal;1981911 said:I wanted to do this anyway, but I thought we might make a play for a 2nd or 3rd tier vet. We didn't so now we must (and rightfully so) spend 2 picks on CB in the 1st three rounds.
Tobal;1981911 said:Right or wrong we've painted ourselves into a corner at corner. Make no mistake, Dallas will not and cannot trade up for DMAC now.
Dallas has to take a CB at 22 or 28 and should spend 2 out of thier 1st 4 picks on CB. This league is a pass happy league. Greenbay and the patriots will go 4 and 5 wide. The Giants and Eagles will or do have the ability to expose our lack of CB depth.
We have one top tier CB and a good but often injured CB. We MUST HAVE a solid number 3 and need a 4th for when Henry or Newman go down for a strecth and we know they will.
I don't want to hear about Alan Ball, he couldn't get playing time over Nate Jones and Oglesby is only a special teams guy.
I wanted to do this anyway, but I thought we might make a play for a 2nd or 3rd tier vet. We didn't so now we must (and rightfully so) spend 2 picks on CB in the 1st three rounds.
big dog cowboy;1981964 said:Now that is settled, so no more DMAC threads. Right?
wayne motley;1982460 said:Sooooooo....you think it absolutely requires a first round talent at CB in order to adequately replace what we lost in Reeves? If that's the case, then we should have just resigned him.
I actually think we can replace Reeves adequately with a CB taken in rounds 1-4....or even with another castoff....we may even have someone on the Roster whom we think can step in for Reeves. I too think we'll take a CB in round 1 or 2, but there's no reason to get desperate because we let Reeves walk.
Yeagermeister;1982474 said:No the 1st rd pick is to eventually replace Henry and upgrade the 3rd cb spot
wayne motley;1982460 said:Sooooooo....you think it absolutely requires a first round talent at CB in order to adequately replace what we lost in Reeves? If that's the case, then we should have just resigned him.
I actually think we can replace Reeves adequately with a CB taken in rounds 1-4....or even with another castoff....we may even have someone on the Roster whom we think can step in for Reeves. I too think we'll take a CB in round 1 or 2, but there's no reason to get desperate because we let Reeves walk.
We didn't let him walk, we shoved him out the door.kØwbØy;1982404 said:in shorter words, we shouldnt of let Reeves walk...
Hostile;1982743 said:We didn't let him walk, we shoved him out the door.