What about letting Steele and Guyton battle it out for the starting RT spot?

If you plan to move Guyton to the right side, you cut Steele because you cannot pay that salary on a backup.
Jerry never should have given Steele the big contract that he did. That just made things difficult. He might be reluctant to deal with the loss that cutting him would entail. Understandably so, imho. It appears we always insist upon painting ourselves into a corner. The choices left are a tad scary. Guyton acquitted himself well at RT in college; maybe he'll find success there again. H-m-m.
 
Last edited:
Yep,
I'm a supporter of Tyler Smith to LT, and then, after signing him of course, Hoffman to either OC or one of the guards.
And then as the OP suggests, but not only Steele and Guyton competing in TC for the RT position, but the other 2 spots being open competition as well.
The cream will rise to the top from there.
Let's see if Riley can stand behind his reputation and really coach these guys up into a cohesive unit.
Result: excellent starting 5 and a very decent backup rotation.

jmo
 
Jerry never should have given Steele the big contract that he did. That just made things difficult. He might be reluctant to deal with the loss that cutting him would entail. Understandably so, imho. It appears we always insist upon painting ourselves into a corner. The choices left are a tad scary. Guyton acquitted himself well at RT in college; maybe he'll find success there again. H-m-m.
W/ a lefthanded Qb. Guyton was the blindside protector in college. He just needs to get up on his technique, and will most likely be a quality OLT.
 
Yep,
I'm a supporter of Tyler Smith to LT, and then, after signing him of course, Hoffman to either OC or one of the guards.
And then as the OP suggests, but not only Steele and Guyton competing in TC for the RT position, but the other 2 spots being open competition as well.
The cream will rise to the top from there.
Let's see if Riley can stand behind his reputation and really coach these guys up into a cohesive unit.
Result: excellent starting 5 and a very decent backup rotation.

jmo
Bad idea. Tyler is a great OG, and a subpar OLT.

I know, I know, Jerry had everyone convinced that Tyler was the OLT of the future, and everyone is still hanging on to that. Tyler was never going to be a high quality OLT, doesn't have the skillset.
 
What about letting these two battle it out, hoping these new coaches can get something out of the both of these players. Who wins the spot, hoping they don't just give it to Steele because he's owed more money! Please give your thoughts
Guy was a rookie 1st rounder that everyone knew was raw. He should be given until after his 2nd yr before being moved. Players NEED TIME to develop.
 
What about letting these two battle it out, hoping these new coaches can get something out of the both of these players. Who wins the spot, hoping they don't just give it to Steele because he's owed more money! Please give your thoughts
Can we just stop with trying to make our established Pro Bowl guard move to Tackle?
 
What about letting these two battle it out, hoping these new coaches can get something out of the both of these players. Who wins the spot, hoping they don't just give it to Steele because he's owed more money! Please give your thoughts
Don't mind the thinking, but OL needs to be the best 5 guys at the 5 positions, so you can't take these guys out of the running at another position especially if this competition would be a tight battle.
 
Guyton was drafted to be LT.

Steele likely won't be a Cowboy at some point. Depends on what the Cowboys do with his contract.

So there won't be any battle for RT between them.
Drafting a guy to play LT that played RT his whole college career is just plain stupid
 
W/ a lefthanded Qb. Guyton was the blindside protector in college. He just needs to get up on his technique, and will most likely be a quality OLT.
I think that's safe to say, although Jerry & Stephen have made the mistake of making their FO a family business. That's something that's not in the best interest of their organization. Whether or not they eventually learn how to run things as need demands, much depends upon their learning what to do, and how to do it correctly. Let's hope the time comes when it happens.

Let's also hope Conor Riley finds a way to get Guyton out of his problems at LT. Evidently, Guyton has the necessary talent, both physically and mentally to improve his performance at LT. If not, perhaps moving to RT might be in his best interest.

Our FO must get their heads straight and somehow, learn to get far better at their jobs. Actually, Jerry needs to fire Stephen but it's highly unlikely, from the looks of things. Thinking that they're doing a great job is anything but conducive to their organization. It's a shame how they refuse to find the humility and self-awareness to admit it their shortcomings.

They stubbornly prefer to maintain the idea that they're not responsible for their woes. It's simply a big mistake that they're failing to recognize their shortcomings for so long. That really needs to change. There are surely those in the NFL who might easily correct their shortcomings, but their stubborn ideas of being great at what they do should have seen and corrected many years ago.
 
Last edited:
What about letting these two battle it out, hoping these new coaches can get something out of the both of these players. Who wins the spot, hoping they don't just give it to Steele because he's owed more money! Please give your thoughts
They drafted Guyton to play LT, they aren't going to move him after 1 season. He was expected to be a raw prospect that needed development.
 
We just need to put the best 5 guys in there regardless of draft position or contract. Steele should be cap casualty. He carries an 18M cap hit if he stays, or a 5M cap savings if we cut him. Extending him makes no sense given the level of his play. And I realize we drafted Guyton to play LT, but he didn't play LT in college. He might be better on the right side. The year prior, we drafted Tyler Smith to succeed Tyron Smith but he turned out to be a better G. You just never know and we shouldn't be locked into anything. We can probably bring Tyron Smith back on a cheap contract too. Even at 75% of what he used to be, he's better than Guyton.
 
We just need to put the best 5 guys in there regardless of draft position or contract. Steele should be cap casualty. He carries an 18M cap hit if he stays, or a 5M cap savings if we cut him. Extending him makes no sense given the level of his play. And I realize we drafted Guyton to play LT, but he didn't play LT in college. He might be better on the right side. The year prior, we drafted Tyler Smith to succeed Tyron Smith but he turned out to be a better G. You just never know and we shouldn't be locked into anything. We can probably bring Tyron Smith back on a cheap contract too. Even at 75% of what he used to be, he's better than Guyton.
Why not just restructure Steele? I’d have to double check but I believe you save more that way than cutting him.
 
Can we just stop with trying to make our established Pro Bowl guard move to Tackle?
He was always going to be an OG. I cannot believe people are still believing Jerryspew, that Tyler was an OLT candidate. He never was.
 
What about letting these two battle it out, hoping these new coaches can get something out of the both of these players. Who wins the spot, hoping they don't just give it to Steele because he's owed more money! Please give your thoughts
Should be Guytons, he's bettwr over there. We need to June first cut Steele he's cooked
 
You can save more. You can cut his 2025 cap hit down to dollar if want to. But then you have put him on the field.
You're right. Looks like you save $9M in a restructure this year vs $14M with a june 1 cut. Still for that price I would rather bring him back. Yes hes a lower end starter, but hes still probably the best Tackle on the roster unless they are seriously looking to bump Smith outside. I have some optimism around Richards being able to start, but I hate to put all my eggs in that basket. I'd rather see him and Guyton compete for the LT job IMO.
 
Jerry never should have given Steele the big contract that he did. That just made things difficult. He might be reluctant to deal with the loss that cutting him would entail. Understandably so, imho. It appears we always insist upon painting ourselves into a corner. The choices left are a tad scary. Guyton acquitted himself well at RT in college; maybe he'll find success there again. H-m-m.
we would save 14M in cash and have 14M dead cap, which would be a wash. but he won't. because he would have to pay for the same position again. and jerry hates that.
Steele is here to stay until at least 26, and it would be becaus Steele would just stink it up even more than he has. wouldn't surprise me to keep him until 27.
 
Hot take but I would argue that Steele's contract really isnt that bad. Hes the 23rd highest AAV in football for Tackles, and $12M per year less than the higher paid Tackle Tristan Wirfs. Steele is a lower end starter in this league, but once you take out the rookie contracts at Tackle he is also paid like one of the lower end starting Tackles in football.

If the Cowboys were to release him Steele would probably get a small raise in free agency. Jonah Williams is probably a good comp in terms of age and overall value and got $15M on the open market last offseason.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
463,842
Messages
13,772,930
Members
23,769
Latest member
1977fan
Back
Top