joseephuss;3864793 said:No, he hasn't settled in nicely at guard. He has done alright, but that is about it. There are better guard options including the ones Dallas already has. Gallery would be a terrible back up at tackle.
Gallery's a good, solid LG. Tough, athletic. All the things he was supposed to be at LT. Would work in DC
egn22;3864782 said:Asking because i rarely watch the Raiders and i have no clue how he's been doing the past years. I just read that he's leaving Oakland and will be a free agent. Any insight on whether or not he'd be an option for us?
speedkilz88;3864903 said:Did he ever play RT? I remember his struggles at LT and his successful move to OG, just don't remember any RT action.
egn22;3864782 said:Asking because i rarely watch the Raiders and i have no clue how he's been doing the past years. I just read that he's leaving Oakland and will be a free agent. Any insight on whether or not he'd be an option for us?
KJJ;3864808 said:Gallery never lived up to his draft status.
ajk23az;3864803 said:Well according to this he has been their best run blocker by far the past 2 years. And that is saying something since Oakland was the 2nd best running team last year, and top 10 in 2008.
Free agent LG Robert Gallery has decided against returning to Oakland after a recent talk with owner Al Davis.
"We've come to a mutual agreement that it's time for me to move on with my career," Gallery explained. The Raiders have been aggressive in re-signing key defenders, but Davis apparently balked at Gallery's asking price. Though he was easily the Raiders' best run-blocker the past two years, Gallery missed 14 of 32 games in 2009-2010. Oakland is expected to turn to second-year developmental project Bruce Campbell, which is quite a leap of faith.
Source: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=6178205
Joe Rod;3865133 said:Dude wanted 8 mil per year and the Raiders were only willing to go to 2.5. That is a lot of cash for an oft-injured guard to ask for.
