What are everyone's opinions on Heath?

RomoFor6

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,019
Reaction score
1,418
What are everyone's opinions on Heath? Was watching him Sunday and feel like he played a great game at safety. Good in centrefield and decent in run support. Way better than what Wilcox or Church have shown. What do you guys think flash in the pan or potential started going forward?
 

StarBoyz83

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,434
Reaction score
11,978
He's better than wilcox. But church is still good he's just having ups and downs. He needs to get it together.
 

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,489
Reaction score
44,544
Heath is actually a pretty good player. Almost always in the right spot and is faster than people think. He will lay the wood too.

He got a bad rep around here for one bad game against Megatron and for the one play where Adrian Peterson pushed over him for a TD. The truth is, Heath was just about to plant AD flat on his back until the Minn TE came up, caught Peterson before he fell and carried/pushed him into the end zone.

Heath is a solid, smart player that is very versatile and big time on special teams.
 

Daillest88

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,552
Reaction score
15,398
Heath is still young and he does have good speed Asthmafield is right. He's only 24 and dies seem like his awareness has gotten better.
 

ccb04

Well-Known Member
Messages
995
Reaction score
671
Like Heath better than Wilcox. Church has been playing with a high ankle sprain...and I prefer him over Wilcox as well.
 

skinsscalper

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,146
Reaction score
5,693
The thing I noticed most about Heath this past weekend is that I didn't notice Heath. For the most part that's a good thing.

The kid played his heart out against the Bucs and it just didn't translate to a win but make no mistake about it he helped keep us in that game. It was a heartbreaker, as a fan, that the penalty at the end pf the game cost us a possible win but we may not have even been in that game if it weren't for a couple of clutch plays by the kid.

One thing about Heath is that he doesn't have the physical gifts of other safeties around the league so he has to play on his smarts. The problem with that dynamic for Heath is that in order to get really good at playing the game that way is to actually play. He's gotten a lot better at that this past season. In, fact he's improved on it from pretty much his very first game. He hasn't really regressed in any way since he started to get playing time. He hasn't exactly exploded in his development either but I'll take a guy on his upswing any day over a guy that has leveled off and you've already seen his best and has plateaued in his development with less than spectacular results.

Usually when Heath gets beat, he gets beat physically. He doesn't blow a ton of assignments mentally. Don't get me wrong, I'd take an upgrade at the position all day long but this year we could do a lot worse than Heath at the position especially with the depth in the defensive backfield being tested lately by injury.
 

bark

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,039
Reaction score
7,404
He has quietly been playing better the past few games. Unlike jj he is always where he is suppose to be.
 

RJ_MacReady

It's all in the reflexes
Messages
3,974
Reaction score
7,123
Well, he is better than Wilcox, which pains me to say because JJ was one of my pet cats since we drafted him. But then again, I was a believer in Matt Johnson, too....<wipes egg from face>
 

Yakuza Rich

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,043
Reaction score
12,385
Heath is actually a pretty good player. Almost always in the right spot and is faster than people think. He will lay the wood too.

He got a bad rep around here for one bad game against Megatron and for the one play where Adrian Peterson pushed over him for a TD. The truth is, Heath was just about to plant AD flat on his back until the Minn TE came up, caught Peterson before he fell and carried/pushed him into the end zone.

Heath is a solid, smart player that is very versatile and big time on special teams.

He's been far worse than that over his career to get that rep.

But, that is what it is...a rep. He's played well in recent weeks.

Personally, I don't think he's the starter you want if you're looking to put forth a dynamic pass defense.






YR
 

sureletsrace

Official CZ Homer
Messages
4,622
Reaction score
4,197
I think that Heath is a highly athletic Safety who played for a small school. He went undrafted in 2013 and was thrown into the fire so to speak and unfairly got a bad rap quick and quickly became a whipping boy for fans.

The Cowboys were/are excited about his potential and signed him knowing he would take time to develop. He has amazing physical tools, he just needs time to learn the game and get acclimated to the speed and strategy difference of the NFL.

DBs typically take a few years to come into their own when making the transition from NCAA to NFL, especially when they're from a small school.

Now that he's had a couple training camps under his belt along with some live game action, I don't think it is a surprise that he's playing well.

TL;DR Small school kid coming into his own now after unfairly taking on a starter role too early and earning the hatred of fans. Has physical tools to be a very good starting safety.
 

BoysfanfromCanada

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,997
Reaction score
6,475
I feel like any safety off the street would be better than Wilcox at this point. That guy just isn't going to get it, he still whiffs on every open field tackle.

As for Heath, he's ok. Not terrible, but I think the fact he's white makes people think he's not as good as he is. Nick eatman said something to that effect last week on cowboys break.
 

TonyRomo17

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,813
Reaction score
1,018
The thing I noticed most about Heath this past weekend is that I didn't notice Heath. For the most part that's a good thing.

The kid played his heart out against the Bucs and it just didn't translate to a win but make no mistake about it he helped keep us in that game. It was a heartbreaker, as a fan, that the penalty at the end pf the game cost us a possible win but we may not have even been in that game if it weren't for a couple of clutch plays by the kid.

One thing about Heath is that he doesn't have the physical gifts of other safeties around the league so he has to play on his smarts. The problem with that dynamic for Heath is that in order to get really good at playing the game that way is to actually play. He's gotten a lot better at that this past season. In, fact he's improved on it from pretty much his very first game. He hasn't really regressed in any way since he started to get playing time. He hasn't exactly exploded in his development either but I'll take a guy on his upswing any day over a guy that has leveled off and you've already seen his best and has plateaued in his development with less than spectacular results.

Usually when Heath gets beat, he gets beat physically. He doesn't blow a ton of assignments mentally. Don't get me wrong, I'd take an upgrade at the position all day long but this year we could do a lot worse than Heath at the position especially with the depth in the defensive backfield being tested lately by injury.

Pretty sure Heath is more athletic than Church and Wilcox
 

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,489
Reaction score
44,544
He's been far worse than that over his career to get that rep.

But, that is what it is...a rep. He's played well in recent weeks.

Personally, I don't think he's the starter you want if you're looking to put forth a dynamic pass defense.






YR

I somewhat disagree that he's been far worse than that over his time in Dallas. Plenty of people complained about him in more than just those two games, but he wasn't that bad IMO.

I do agree completely that he probably isn't the starter that you want in your defense. I leave some room there for a small chance that he does turn out to be a starter... but that's quite a longshot, IMO.

He really has been playing well lately though, as you mentioned.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,571
Reaction score
27,856
I somewhat disagree that he's been far worse than that over his time in Dallas. Plenty of people complained about him in more than just those two games, but he wasn't that bad IMO.

I do agree completely that he probably isn't the starter that you want in your defense. I leave some room there for a small chance that he does turn out to be a starter... but that's quite a longshot, IMO.

He really has been playing well lately though, as you mentioned.

It wasn't just Detroit and Minnesota. It was also GB and @NYG. Teams started targeting him and he struggled. He always seemed right on the cusp of making plays and would just fail.

I never got down on him because he was a div 2 UDFA and he was close and I tend to think young players get better. I think if you adjust your expectations accordingly youre right he wasn't that bad. It was obvious he had the head to play the game. He has gotten better and is a very good backup S. Very physical.
 
Top