he's average -- which is really all we need at FS to do well.
if we are going to get average though, I'd prefer Coleman b/c his experience would make him more valueable. Coleman's INT #s were down the last 2 years but he had 25 more career picks than Manuel. That wouldn't be surprising seeing that Coleman is a 10 year vet and Manuel is a 4 year vet. What is surprising is that Coleman has 25 MORE career ints than Manuel. That's right -- Manuel has never had an INT in 4 years.