silverbear;1350754 said:
Given that he's never actually had to do anything of the sort, how do you reckon they determined that??
Either you're organized, or you're not. You can't work with a guy 60-70 hours a week and not know whether or not he's got organizational skills. And you don't ask permission to interview a coach without checking with contacts around the league who can vouch for his potential.
silverbear;1350754 said:
"Assistant head coach" is really little more than an HONORARY title, a loophole designed to allow teams to get around the rule against lateral hires...
Compared to being either an offensive or defensive coordinator, the duties of an assistant head coach are largely ceremonial...
I hear this said a lot, but I've never seen it reliably demonstrated. I think part of the reason the AHC title is attractive to assistants is that it implies there's some level of training involved that better prepares them for an eventual HC gig.
silverbear;1350754 said:
Note also that the Niners chose NOT to interview Singletary for THEIR defensive coordinator position; that ought to tell you something...
It does say something. I'm not sure what, though.
It could be that Singletary has skills that are well suited to a HC role but which would be exposed if he were a DC. Since he's already a HC candidate, why take the unnecessary risk?
It could be that he only wants to be considered for HC positions. (I haven't heard anything from Singletary either way about whether or not he want's the SF DC position. I have heard he didn't want to be considered for it in Dallas).
It could be that part of his arrangement with SF is that his HC duties actually have some significance, and he couldn't realistically continue to prepare if he were also responsible for the entire defense.
It could be that the 9ers just don't think he's capable of doing the job well at all. Hard to say.