It really seems like a lot of our players get worse the more they are in our system. Our only two cornerback INTs are from new guys the last two weeks what does that say?
Hitchens, Wilcox, Escobar, Street to name several have not progressed or have gotten worse. Probably could add Twill, Beasley and Hanna to that mix too.
Then guys go elsewhere and flourish - Dwayne Harris, Bennett, Weeden (OMG), to name several.
There is something wrong with this Garrett way of doing things. All this talk about how they play hard for him but something is off. Playing hard is not the same as playing well or playing smart. I really think there is such an emphasis on the psychological stuff (speeches, grand gestures, field trips), that the Xs and Os take a back seat. I think the instincts and joy are taken away from these guys and they are programmed to be robots but with bad data. I think Garrett fills their heads with just try and fight and it will all work out but this isn't Little Giants it's the NFL.
I dunno but something is way off.
I do think that is a bias distortion.
Why ? Because you are trying to find a tendency by picking the players that seem to approve your point of view and not by examine the whole roster or every aspect of it.
So if you say that players regress in our system then
- why is Frederick voted to his 1st probowl in his 2nd year and to his 2nd probowl in his third year ?
- Why did Smith need some years at right and left tackle but now is considered as one of the best at his position ? To me thats pro- and not regression.
- Why is Martin going to the probowl again in his 2nd year ?
- Why is DMC having one of the best years of his career when he shouldnt given your argumentation ? He should have played better in Oakland when i follow your logic.
- Why is Witten under Garrett still a great TE ?
- Why had Romo his best season last year ? Shouldnt he already been benched given your thesis ?
- Isnt Lee still playing at a high level after being in Dallas for how long now ?
- Didnt McClain ressurrect his career with us after being a dissapointement in Oakland ?
- Isnt Beasly someone who progressed over the last two years ?
- Hana is now a good blocking TE.
- Didnt DeMarco Murray developed over the years before leaving to the Eagles ?
- Didnt Dwayne Harris progressed as a return and kickoff/punt covering specialist over the years in Dallas ? I dont think he would have gotten that kind of deal in NY if he regressed in the last years with us.
- Orlando Scandrick, J. Parnell, Leary all progressed with us.
I also have to question that players that left us all are much better now that they are playing with other teams:
- Murray for instance. Given your logic he should have played even better. Last time i checked he was benched in Philly.
- Harris has slightly better stats at WR then in his years in Dallas. The main reason is because he started 6 games in NY where in Dallas with Bryant/Williams/Beasly he was not good enough to break the lineup. His punt return stats and his kickoff return stats are nearly the same as in Dallas. Slightly better or worse doesnt matter: its not like he mutated into something he wasnt in Dallas. He is the same player he was for us. No progression i can sense here.
- Weeden had one good game against TENNESSEE. I mean come on. And it wasnt like he lit up the air. He had 200 yds passing. The game before he had 108 yds passing. He is the same captain checkdown he was in Dallas. Maybe he has better players around him ? Ever thought about that ?
- Jason Hatcher had his best season (and so progressed) under Garrett. After he left to WAS he regressed.
I give you Bennett. But he never had a chance to start in Dallas. And in those years he was with us i still prefer witten over him because at those times Witten was the better player.
I do think most players prosper in the right system. If they dont fit it they wont crack the starting lineup or wont be very productive. There are exceptions - great players - but they are as the noune says not the norm. Most players need to find a system fit and so do coaches find players who fit their system. You cant expect coaches to change the whole system to maximize players abilities. Maybe with great one coaches twinker their plays but they dont change their philosophy.
Short: That players play good or bad has nothing to do with the values Garrett is trying to establish or emphasizes.
You have to find players that fit your system. With some you see talent in them but you have to develop them. That takes time. If you change system in the meantime players suffer in their abilities to fit the new system. That makes it even harder. Thats why i am a big believer in JJs approach to have stability in the coaches. At least with those who influence the system most that the team is using (HC, OC, DC).