I'm concerned that some may be concerned that he is a guard.
We can't afford to pass up a 10 year top LT at 10, but we also can't afford to end up with a guard.
Nothing happened to him.He was a supposed lock to go #2/3 overall, and a can't miss stud LT.
Suddenly, as the season ended and media mocks started to surface....he is now projected more often in the 8-12 range, even later in some cases.
He is behind Slater in many mocks.
Thoughts on what happened between December and now as far as his stock?
Most if not all of us figured Lamb would never be there either.I really don't want Slater at 10. But if Sewell fell to 10, then it gets interesting IMO.
Sewell’s a LT - Slater’s an OG.I'm concerned that some may be concerned that he is a guard.
We can't afford to pass up a 10 year top LT at 10, but we also can't afford to end up with a guard.
I really don't want Slater at 10. But if Sewell fell to 10, then it gets interesting IMO.
Same. Only way I want an OL in Rd 1 right now is if he's a rare prospect like Sewell.
He looks like a drop back and pass every play LT. He’s solid in pass protection. I think you’re right what happened? The reason I like Slater is his run blocking (although he played at Northwestern). Slater looks like a beast and Sewell looks more finesse. Sewell is probably the safer pick, he’ll likely go before Slater, but you might move Slater to LG and have the better player for a run offense
We can afford both. Could be Larry Allen type deal where he plays LG his first 1-2 seasons then kicks outside if we want to move on from Tyron.I'm concerned that some may be concerned that he is a guard.
We can't afford to pass up a 10 year top LT at 10, but we also can't afford to end up with a guard.
We aren't a run offense.