What If DAL Would've Cut Tony Romo In 2004?

[Frozen700]

Well, according to some "fans," without Romo, we'd have won multiple Super Bowls from 2006-present. Because Romo is the problem.

Show us these posts, of these fans. You said it, so it must be true. Finding 1 post of a fan on here saying that shouldn't be hard.

 

[Wayne02]

Well, according to some "fans," without Romo, we'd have won multiple Super Bowls from 2006-present. Because Romo is the problem.

Who said that the Cowboys would have won multiple Super Bowls without Romo?

 

[Wayne02]

Show us these posts, of these fans. You said it, so it must be true. Finding 1 post of a fan on here saying that shouldn't be hard.

He only made that outrageously bogus claim to get a few "likes" it's the Skip Bayless tactic.

 

[Frozen700]

He only made that outrageously bogus claim to get a few "likes" it's the Skip Bayless tactic.

Ah I see. That explains it, and clears things up for me.

Lol

 

[TellerMorrow34]

I'm sure you could go back and look at some posts from a couple of guys who were here at the time and find where they believed we'd have won a Superbowl(s) without Romo. I am not sure how many there were, or how often it was said, and frankly it doesn't matter either way to be quite honest.

There were people here in 2007 who absolutely believe we'd have won in 2007 if Romo hadn't been our QB. Of course those were the people who put the entire Giants loss on him and let everyone else off the hook for their stupidity.

Oh well.