What if Kitna rattles off 8 straight wins...

jamesdojr

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,036
Reaction score
374
When Romo is healthy, do we put him back in or bench him if Kitna has put us back in contention? Far-fetched, I know, but not out of the spectrum of possibility... something to think about.
 
Kitna won't stay healthy enough to rattle off 2 straight wins.
 
hidinghomer.gif
 
If Kitna leads this team to 8 straight, you keep playing him. That may not be a popular decision, but I'd go with the hot hand over starting a guy who hasn't played in 8 weeks.

Not going to happen, though...
 
OP...why even try asking these types questions all you ever get are responses from people trying to be comedians.
 
On the "spectrum of possibility" it's less possible than toasters flying.
 
CowboysFaninBaltimore;3654100 said:
I don't even care anymore, whats the point really? The Steelers are far better.

What the heck do the Steelers have to do with it - that is unless you are predisposed to being a Steeler fan anyway, in which case your thought really doesn't apply to anyone here other than you.
 
Might as well ask what do we do if Victor Butler comes in the game and gets 15 sacks in limited duty in one game. Does he start over Spencer then!?

How the hell is Kitna going to win 2 games, much less 8, when our pro bowl stud of a QB couldnt' overcome the rest of the team to win more than 1 out of 5?
 
jamesdojr;3654089 said:
When Romo is healthy, do we put him back in or bench him if Kitna has put us back in contention? Far-fetched, I know, but not out of the spectrum of possibility... something to think about.

Then we will be in the playoffs likely (the way NFC is going) Wade and company will be retained atleast one more year for the (lockout year) , Do you want that ?
:laugh2:
 
nalam;3654147 said:
Then we will be in the playoffs likely (the way NFC is going) Wade and company will be retained atleast one more year for the (lockout year) , Do you want that ?
:laugh2:

ABSOLUTELY. And so should you. I can't fathom the mentality of someone not wanting their team to make the playoffs. Seriously? :bang2:
 
Whoever compared this to the Kurt Warner situation, just stop. Warner was a guy who came out of nowhere. We know what we have in Kitna, and it's not Kurt Warner.

Kitna is barely above 1:1 TD to INT ratio for his career, and he fumbles about once a game too.

This is not some dominant defensive team like the Steelers who can overcome mediocre QB play. This is a team that couldn't even win with a QB on pace for over 5k yards and over 30 TDs.
 
jamesdojr;3654089 said:
When Romo is healthy, do we put him back in or bench him if Kitna has put us back in contention? Far-fetched, I know, but not out of the spectrum of possibility... something to think about.

You bench him in favor of Elvis Grbac:lmao2:
 
jamesdojr;3654089 said:
When Romo is healthy, do we put him back in or bench him if Kitna has put us back in contention? Far-fetched, I know, but not out of the spectrum of possibility... something to think about.

I'll play along. If Kitna runs off 8 straight wins, the MOMENT Tony Romo is healthy enough to play, HE PLAYS. Period.

One of the dumbest things the Cowboys ever did was have Steve Beurlein start the playoff game in Detroit.

Beurlein's little run was due to a VERY favorable schedule, a VERY conservative game plan, and SOME LUCK, and yet (just like with Steve Walsh) there were idiots saying that Aikman wasn't the guy. Well, the very next year Aikman was the Super Bowl MVP.

Tony Romo is our QB, and he SHOULD be our QB, no matter what Jon Kitna does.
 
Kitna is Kitna... He's OK.

The real problems of this team are the offensive line and the defense.

If Romo couldn't win 4 out of 6 with this club, then no way does Kitna win 7 out of the remaining 10.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
474,552
Messages
14,545,021
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top