kartr;1229052 said:
The only reason that the Saints debacle won't be repeated is because we don't play them every week and most teams in the NFC are weak. Against the Bears defense, the Chargers, the Ravens, they will give us the same thing that the Saints did. Romo may be our qb, but he is not the answer. He is pretty good against weak teams, but that is about all.
This is a pretty myopic perspective.
First, any
BEST/STRONG/GREAT defense can take down a great quarterback or make him look average.
Examples: The 1990 NY Giants that beat Joe Montana's 49ers in the NFC Championship Game (15-13), the 1992/1993 Cowboys team that beat Steve Young's 49ers in the NFC Championship Game, the 1986 Giants that beat the John Elway-led Denver Broncos, the 90s Cowboys who repeatedly beat the Brett Favre-led Packers, the 70s Steelers defense who beat the Staubach-led Cowboys in two Super Bowls, etc.
In fact, when was the last time you saw a great quarterback carve up a great defense?
When was the last time you saw a great quarterback put up Drew Brees numbers against a great defense when his team was down 42-17?
Second, you do understand that if the Cowboys become one of those
BEST teams with one of those
BEST defenses, then it benefits Romo too. And when we do become the
BEST, the other teams will be weak by comparison.
Third, the only time you can really say a quarterback isn't doing the job is when he's getting perfect protection, his receivers are wide open and he
STILL can't deliver the ball with accuracy.
Absent those situations, it's not only on the quarterback but the offensive line, the running game and the receivers. If he doesn't succeed against the Ravens, Chargers or Bears, it's likely going to be because the other units of the offense (the offensive line and the receivers and running backs) didn't do what they were supposed to do.